Trading Results I lovethepips

THROW YOUR FD's in FDS

Factset: How You can Invest in Hedge Funds’ Biggest Investment
Tl;dr FactSet is the most undervalued widespread SaaS/IT solution stock that exists
If any of you have relevant experience or are friends with people in Investment Banking/other high finance, you know that Factset is the lifeblood of their financial analysis toolkit if and when it’s not Bloomberg, which isn’t even publicly traded. Factset has been around since 1978 and it’s considered a staple like Bloomberg in many wealth management firms, and it offers some of the easiest to access and understandable financial data so many newer firms focused less on trading are switching to Factset because it has a lot of the same data Bloomberg offers for half the cost. When it comes to modern financial data, Factset outcompetes Reuters and arguably Bloomberg as well due to their API services which makes Factset much more preferable for quantitative divisions of banks/hedge funds as API integration with Python/R is the most important factor for vast data lakes of financial data, this suggests Factset will be much more prepared for programming making its way into traditional finance fields. According to Factset, their mission for data delivery is to: “Integrate the data you need with your applications, web portals, and statistical packages. Whether you need market, company, or alternative data, FactSet flexible data delivery services give you normalized data through APIs and a direct delivery of local copies of standard data feeds. Our unique symbology links and aggregates a variety of content sources to ensure consistency, transparency, and data integrity across your business. Build financial models and power customized applications with FactSet APIs in our developer portal”. Their technical focus for their data delivery system alone should make it stand out compared to Bloomberg, whose UI is far more outdated and complex on top of not being as technically developed as Factset’s. Factset is the key provider of buy-side portfolio analysis for IBs, Hedge funds, and Private Equity firms, and it’s making its way into non-quantitative hedge funds as well because quantitative portfolio management makes automation of risk management and the application of portfolio theory so much easier, and to top it off, Factset’s scenario analysis and simulation is unique in its class. Factset also is able to automate trades based on individual manager risk tolerance and ML optimization for Forex trading as well. Not only does Factset provide solutions for financial companies, they are branching out to all corporations now and providing quantitative analytics for them in the areas of “corporate development, M&A, strategy, treasury, financial planning and analysis, and investor relations workflows”. Factset will eventually in my opinion reach out to Insurance Risk Management a lot more in the future as that’s a huge industry which has yet to see much automation of risk management yet, and with the field wide open, Factset will be the first to take advantage without a shadow of a doubt. So let’s dig into the company’s financials now:
Their latest 8k filing reported the following:
Revenue increased 2.6%, or $9.6 million, to $374.1 million compared with $364.5 million for the same period in fiscal 2019. The increase is primarily due to higher sales of analytics, content and technology solutions (CTS) and wealth management solutions.
Annual Subscription Value (ASV) plus professional services was $1.52 billion at May 31, 2020, compared with $1.45 billion at May 31, 2019. The organic growth rate, which excludes the effects of acquisitions, dispositions, and foreign currency movements, was 5.0%. The primary contributors to this growth rate were higher sales in FactSet's wealth and research workflow solutions and a price increase in the Company's international region
Adjusted operating margin improved to 35.5% compared with 34.0% in the prior year period primarily as a result of reduced employee-related operating expenses due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) increased 11.0% to $2.63 compared with $2.37 for the same period in fiscal 2019.
Adjusted diluted EPS rose 9.2% to $2.86 compared with $2.62 in the prior year period primarily driven by an improvement in operating results.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the third quarter decreased to 15.0% compared with 18.6% a year ago, primarily due to an income tax expense in the prior year related to finalizing the Company's tax returns with no similar event for the three months ended May 31, 2020.
FactSet increased its quarterly dividend by $0.05 per share or 7% to $0.77 marking the fifteenth consecutive year the Company has increased dividends, highlighting its continued commitment to returning value to shareholders.
As you can see, there’s not much of a negative sign in sight here.
It makes sense considering how FactSet’s FCF has never slowed down:
https://preview.redd.it/frmtdk8e9hk51.png?width=276&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c0ff12539e0b2f9dbfda13d0565c5ce2b6f8f1a

https://preview.redd.it/6axdb6lh9hk51.png?width=593&format=png&auto=webp&s=9af1673272a5a2d8df28f60f4707e948a00e5ff1
FactSet’s annual subscriptions and professional services have made its way to foreign and developing markets, and many of them are opting for FactSet’s cheaper services to reduce costs and still get copious amounts of data and models to work with.
Here’s what FactSet had to say regarding its competitive position within the market of providing financial data in its last 10k: “Despite competing products and services, we enjoy high barriers to entry and believe it would be difficult for another vendor to quickly replicate the extensive databases we currently offer. Through our in-depth analytics and client service, we believe we can offer clients a more comprehensive solution with one of the broadest sets of functionalities, through a desktop or mobile user interface or through a standardized or bespoke data feed.” And FactSet is confident that their ML services cannot be replaced by anybody else in the industry either: “In addition, our applications, including our client support and service offerings, are entrenched in the workflow of many financial professionals given the downloading functions and portfolio analysis/screening capabilities offered. We are entrusted with significant amounts of our clients' own proprietary data, including portfolio holdings. As a result, our products have become central to our clients’ investment analysis and decision-making.” (https://last10k.com/sec-filings/fds#link_fullReport), if you read the full report and compare it to the most recent 8K, you’ll find that the real expenses this quarter were far lower than expected by the last 10k as there was a lower than expected tax rate and a 3% increase in expected operating margin from the expected figure as well. The company also reports a 90% customer retention rate over 15 years, so you know that they’re not lying when they say the clients need them for all sorts of financial data whether it’s for M&A or wealth management and Equity analysis:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/factset.asp
https://preview.redd.it/yo71y6qj9hk51.png?width=355&format=png&auto=webp&s=a9414bdaa03c06114ca052304a26fae2773c3e45

FactSet also has remarkably good cash conversion considering it’s a subscription based company, a company structure which usually takes on too much leverage. Speaking of leverage, FDS had taken on a lot of leverage in 2015:

https://preview.redd.it/oxaa1wel9hk51.png?width=443&format=png&auto=webp&s=13d60d2518980360c403364f7150392ab83d07d7
So what’s that about? Why were FactSet’s long term debts at 0 and all of a sudden why’d the spike up? Well usually for a company that’s non-cyclical and has a well-established product (like FactSet) leverage can actually be good at amplifying returns, so FDS used this to their advantage and this was able to help the share’s price during 2015. Also, as you can see debt/ebitda is beginning a rapid decline anyway. This only adds to my theory that FactSet is trying to expand into new playing fields. FactSet obviously didn’t need the leverage to cover their normal costs, because they have always had consistently growing margins and revenue so the debt financing was only for the sake of financing growth. And this debt can be considered covered and paid off, considering the net income growth of 32% between 2018 and 2019 alone and the EPS growth of 33%
https://preview.redd.it/e4trju3p9hk51.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=6f6bee15f836c47e73121054ec60459f147d353e

EBITDA has virtually been exponential for FactSet for a while because of the bang-for-buck for their well-known product, but now as FactSet ventures into algorithmic trading and corporate development the scope for growth is broadly expanded.
https://preview.redd.it/yl7f58tr9hk51.png?width=489&format=png&auto=webp&s=68906b9ecbcf6d886393c4ff40f81bdecab9e9fd

P/E has declined in the past 2 years, making it a great time to buy.

https://preview.redd.it/4mqw3t4t9hk51.png?width=445&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8d719f4913883b044c4150f11b8732e14797b6d
Increasing ROE despite lowering of leverage post 2016
https://preview.redd.it/lt34avzu9hk51.png?width=441&format=png&auto=webp&s=f3742ed87cd1c2ccb7a3d3ee71ae8c7007313b2b

Mountains of cash have been piling up in the coffers increasing chances of increased dividends for shareholders (imo dividend is too low right now, but increasing it will tempt more investors into it), and on top of that in the last 10k a large buyback expansion program was implemented for $210m worth of shares, which shows how confident they are in the company itself.
https://preview.redd.it/fliirmpx9hk51.png?width=370&format=png&auto=webp&s=1216eddeadb4f84c8f4f48692a2f962ba2f1e848

SGA expense/Gross profit has been declining despite expansion of offices
I’m a bit concerned about the skin in the game leadership has in this company, since very few executives/board members have significant holdings in the company, but the CEO himself is a FactSet veteran, and knows his way around the company. On top of that, Bloomberg remains king for trading and the fixed income security market, and Reuters beats out FactSet here as well. If FactSet really wants to increase cash flow sources, the expansion into insurance and corp dev has to be successful.
Summary: FactSet has a lot of growth still left in its industry which is already fast-growing in and of itself, and it only has more potential at its current valuation. Earnings September 24th should be a massive beat due to investment banking demand and growth plus Hedge fund requirements for data and portfolio management hasn’t gone anywhere and has likely increased due to more market opportunities to buy-in.
Calls have shitty greeks, but if you're ballsy October 450s LOL, I'm holding shares
I’d say it’s a great long term investment, and it should at least be on your watchlist.
submitted by WannabeStonks69 to wallstreetbets [link] [comments]

Chance Me: CS Major

Reposting because I didn't get input last time.
Demographics: Indian. Male. From ProspeFrisco Texas. Middle/Upper class area. I would say my high school is very competitive.
Intended Major(s): Computer Science
ACT/SAT/SAT II: SAT: Have not taken a real test. I have taken three practice test all resulted 1440+. Prepping for 1500+, but consider my score to be a flat 1400 for now.
UW GPA and Rank: UW: 3.981 Rank: 12/979
Coursework:
Freshmen Year:
- Honors French 1 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- HonoGT Geometry (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors Computer Science 1
- Honors Biology (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Human (Highest Level that year available to me ) (4)
- Honors English 1 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Outdoor Education (Required)
- Digital Art and Animation (Required)
Sophomore Year:
- Honors English 2 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors French 2 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Computer Science A (Highest Level that year available to me ) (5)
- AP Computer Science Principles (Highest Level that year available to me ) (4)
- AP World History (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Biology (Highest Level that year available to me ) (3) <-- Not sending this score
- Honors Chemistry (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors Algebra 2 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Academic Level Architecture (Highest Level that year available to me )
Junior Year:
- AP English 3 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Independent Studies in Video Games (AP Level but not AP) (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors UIL Math Prep
- Ap Physics 1 (Highest Level that year available to me ) (5)
- Academic Level US History
- AP Chemistry (Highest Level that year available to me ) (4)
- AP Environmental (Highest Level that year available to me ) (5)
- Honors Pre-Cal (Highest Level that year available to me )
Senior Year (will take upcoming year):
- Honors Computer Science 3 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors Computer Science 2 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP English 4 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Gov/Econ (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Physics C (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Calc BC (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Stats (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Still Deciding but not AP for sure.
Awards:
- Adobe Certified Associate - Visual Design using Adobe Photoshop CC2015
- Aloha Math Competition Certificate.
- UIL Math Competition Certificate.
- Multiple Student of the month award
Extracurriculars:
Essays/LORs:
Essays, I have not started.
Letter of Rec: I have three incoming from my teachers. English/CounseloComputer Science/ Math (waiting for response)
Schools:
- MIT,
- Brown University
- Caltech
- Carnegie Mellon
- Columbia University
- Cornell University
- Duke University
- Georgia Institute
- Hamilton
- Harvard University
- Johns Hopkins University
- Princeton University
- Purdue University
- Rice University
- Stanford
- UMich
- UT Austin
- UT Dallas
- Texas A&M
- UC Berkley
submitted by goyalyug000 to chanceme [link] [comments]

Factset DD

Factset: How You can Invest in Hedge Funds’ Biggest Investment
Tl;dr FactSet is the most undervalued widespread SaaS/IT solution stock that exists
If any of you have relevant experience or are friends with people in Investment Banking/other high finance, you know that Factset is the lifeblood of their financial analysis toolkit if and when it’s not Bloomberg, which isn’t even publicly traded. Factset has been around since 1978 and it’s considered a staple like Bloomberg in many wealth management firms, and it offers some of the easiest to access and understandable financial data so many newer firms focused less on trading are switching to Factset because it has a lot of the same data Bloomberg offers for half the cost. When it comes to modern financial data, Factset outcompetes Reuters and arguably Bloomberg as well due to their API services which makes Factset much more preferable for quantitative divisions of banks/hedge funds as API integration with Python/R is the most important factor for vast data lakes of financial data, this suggests Factset will be much more prepared for programming making its way into traditional finance fields. According to Factset, their mission for data delivery is to: “Integrate the data you need with your applications, web portals, and statistical packages. Whether you need market, company, or alternative data, FactSet flexible data delivery services give you normalized data through APIs and a direct delivery of local copies of standard data feeds. Our unique symbology links and aggregates a variety of content sources to ensure consistency, transparency, and data integrity across your business. Build financial models and power customized applications with FactSet APIs in our developer portal”. Their technical focus for their data delivery system alone should make it stand out compared to Bloomberg, whose UI is far more outdated and complex on top of not being as technically developed as Factset’s. Factset is the key provider of buy-side portfolio analysis for IBs, Hedge funds, and Private Equity firms, and it’s making its way into non-quantitative hedge funds as well because quantitative portfolio management makes automation of risk management and the application of portfolio theory so much easier, and to top it off, Factset’s scenario analysis and simulation is unique in its class. Factset also is able to automate trades based on individual manager risk tolerance and ML optimization for Forex trading as well. Not only does Factset provide solutions for financial companies, they are branching out to all corporations now and providing quantitative analytics for them in the areas of “corporate development, M&A, strategy, treasury, financial planning and analysis, and investor relations workflows”. Factset will eventually in my opinion reach out to Insurance Risk Management a lot more in the future as that’s a huge industry which has yet to see much automation of risk management yet, and with the field wide open, Factset will be the first to take advantage without a shadow of a doubt. So let’s dig into the company’s financials now:
Their latest 8k filing reported the following:
Revenue increased 2.6%, or $9.6 million, to $374.1 million compared with $364.5 million for the same period in fiscal 2019. The increase is primarily due to higher sales of analytics, content and technology solutions (CTS) and wealth management solutions.
Annual Subscription Value (ASV) plus professional services was $1.52 billion at May 31, 2020, compared with $1.45 billion at May 31, 2019. The organic growth rate, which excludes the effects of acquisitions, dispositions, and foreign currency movements, was 5.0%. The primary contributors to this growth rate were higher sales in FactSet's wealth and research workflow solutions and a price increase in the Company's international region
Adjusted operating margin improved to 35.5% compared with 34.0% in the prior year period primarily as a result of reduced employee-related operating expenses due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) increased 11.0% to $2.63 compared with $2.37 for the same period in fiscal 2019.
Adjusted diluted EPS rose 9.2% to $2.86 compared with $2.62 in the prior year period primarily driven by an improvement in operating results.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the third quarter decreased to 15.0% compared with 18.6% a year ago, primarily due to an income tax expense in the prior year related to finalizing the Company's tax returns with no similar event for the three months ended May 31, 2020.
FactSet increased its quarterly dividend by $0.05 per share or 7% to $0.77 marking the fifteenth consecutive year the Company has increased dividends, highlighting its continued commitment to returning value to shareholders.
As you can see, there’s not much of a negative sign in sight here.
It makes sense considering how FactSet’s FCF has never slowed down
FactSet’s annual subscriptions and professional services have made its way to foreign and developing markets, and many of them are opting for FactSet’s cheaper services to reduce costs and still get copious amounts of data and models to work with.
Here’s what FactSet had to say regarding its competitive position within the market of providing financial data in its last 10k: “Despite competing products and services, we enjoy high barriers to entry and believe it would be difficult for another vendor to quickly replicate the extensive databases we currently offer. Through our in-depth analytics and client service, we believe we can offer clients a more comprehensive solution with one of the broadest sets of functionalities, through a desktop or mobile user interface or through a standardized or bespoke data feed.” And FactSet is confident that their ML services cannot be replaced by anybody else in the industry either: “In addition, our applications, including our client support and service offerings, are entrenched in the workflow of many financial professionals given the downloading functions and portfolio analysis/screening capabilities offered. We are entrusted with significant amounts of our clients' own proprietary data, including portfolio holdings. As a result, our products have become central to our clients’ investment analysis and decision-making.” (https://last10k.com/sec-filings/fds#link_fullReport), if you read the full report and compare it to the most recent 8K, you’ll find that the real expenses this quarter were far lower than expected by the last 10k as there was a lower than expected tax rate and a 3% increase in expected operating margin from the expected figure as well. The company also reports a 90% customer retention rate over 15 years, so you know that they’re not lying when they say the clients need them for all sorts of financial data whether it’s for M&A or wealth management and Equity analysis:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/factset.asp

FactSet also has remarkably good cash conversion considering it’s a subscription based company, a company structure which usually takes on too much leverage. Speaking of leverage, FDS had taken on a lot of leverage in 2015:

So what’s that about? Why were FactSet’s long term debts at 0 and all of a sudden why’d the spike up? Well usually for a company that’s non-cyclical and has a well-established product (like FactSet) leverage can actually be good at amplifying returns, so FDS used this to their advantage and this was able to help the share’s price during 2015. Also, as you can see debt/ebitda is beginning a rapid decline anyway. This only adds to my theory that FactSet is trying to expand into new playing fields. FactSet obviously didn’t need the leverage to cover their normal costs, because they have always had consistently growing margins and revenue so the debt financing was only for the sake of financing growth. And this debt can be considered covered and paid off, considering the net income growth of 32% between 2018 and 2019 alone and the EPS growth of 33%

EBITDA has virtually been exponential for FactSet for a while because of the bang-for-buck for their well-known product, but now as FactSet ventures into algorithmic trading and corporate development the scope for growth is broadly expanded.

P/E has declined in the past 2 years, making it a great time to buy.

Increasing ROE despite lowering of leverage post 2016

Mountains of cash have been piling up in the coffers increasing chances of increased dividends for shareholders (imo dividend is too low right now, but increasing it will tempt more investors into it), and on top of that in the last 10k a large buyback expansion program was implemented for $210m worth of shares, which shows how confident they are in the company itself.

SGA expense/Gross profit has been declining despite expansion of offices
I’m a bit concerned about the skin in the game leadership has in this company, since very few executives/board members have significant holdings in the company, but the CEO himself is a FactSet veteran, and knows his way around the company. On top of that, Bloomberg remains king for trading and the fixed income security market, and Reuters beats out FactSet here as well. If FactSet really wants to increase cash flow sources, the expansion into insurance and corp dev has to be successful.
Summary: FactSet has a lot of growth still left in its industry which is already fast-growing in and of itself, and it only has more potential at its current valuation. Earnings September 24th should be a massive beat due to investment banking demand and growth plus Hedge fund requirements for data and portfolio management hasn’t gone anywhere and has likely increased due to more market opportunities to buy-in.
submitted by WannabeStonks69 to investing [link] [comments]

What are my chances?

Demographics: Indian. Male. From ProspeFrisco Texas. Middle/Upper class area. I would say my high school is very competitive.
Intended Major(s): Computer Science
ACT/SAT/SAT II: SAT: Have not taken a real test. I have taken three practice test all resulted 1440+. Prepping for 1500+, but consider my score to be a flat 1400 for now.
UW GPA and Rank: UW: 3.981 Rank: 12/979
Coursework:
Freshmen Year:
- Honors French 1 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- HonoGT Geometry (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors Computer Science 1
- Honors Biology (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Human (Highest Level that year available to me ) (4)
- Honors English 1 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Outdoor Education (Required)
- Digital Art and Animation (Required)
Sophomore Year:
- Honors English 2 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors French 2 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Computer Science A (Highest Level that year available to me ) (5)
- AP Computer Science Principles (Highest Level that year available to me ) (4)
- AP World History (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Biology (Highest Level that year available to me ) (3) <-- Not sending this score
- Honors Chemistry (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors Algebra 2 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Academic Level Architecture (Highest Level that year available to me )
Junior Year:
- AP English 3 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Independent Studies in Video Games (AP Level but not AP) (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors UIL Math Prep
- Ap Physics 1 (Highest Level that year available to me ) (5)
- Academic Level US History
- AP Chemistry (Highest Level that year available to me ) (4)
- AP Environmental (Highest Level that year available to me ) (5)
- Honors Pre-Cal (Highest Level that year available to me )
Senior Year (will take upcoming year):
- Honors Computer Science 3 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Honors Computer Science 2 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP English 4 (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Gov/Econ (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Physics C (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Calc BC (Highest Level that year available to me )
- AP Stats (Highest Level that year available to me )
- Still Deciding but not AP for sure.

Awards:
- Adobe Certified Associate - Visual Design using Adobe Photoshop CC2015
- Aloha Math Competition Certificate.
- UIL Math Competition Certificate.
- Multiple Student of the month award
Extracurriculars:
Essays/LORs:
Essays, I have not started.
Letter of Rec: I have three incoming from my teachers. English/CounseloComputer Science/ Math (waiting for response)
Schools:
- MIT,
- Brown University
- Caltech
- Carnegie Mellon
- Columbia University
- Cornell University
- Duke University
- Georgia Institute
- Hamilton
- Harvard University
- Johns Hopkins University
- Princeton University
- Purdue University
- Rice University
- Stanford
- UMich
- UT Austin
- UT Dallas
- Texas A&M
- UC Berkley
submitted by goyalyug000 to chanceme [link] [comments]

Reduce Output And Price, Now Is The End Of OPEC?

Reduce Output And Price, Now Is The End Of OPEC?

Photo: Internet
Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020, the global economy has entered a recession, with gold soaring, stock markets tumbling, and oil prices plummeting.
Saudi Arabia cut pricing for oil sales to Asia and the U.S. for October shipments, and the reduction exceeded last month.
Global daily oil consumption (total liquid volume) broke the "100 million barrels" mark for the first time in 2019, reaching 10.96 million barrels. It means the global daily consumption is more than 100 million barrels, and the annual consumption is more than 5 billion tons.
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, fuel demand has decreased significantly, while global oil supply has continued to increase.
Global oil consumption has decreased by nearly a quarter due to COVID-19. The global daily oil consumption level in the second quarter of this year was less than 77 million barrels, which is almost 20 years ago.
20th April saw WTI oil prices plunge from $17.85 to -$37.63, more than a 300% drop, the largest one day drop for U.S. crude in history.
The oil prices up and down in history, and various factors impact the oil prices. One of the most critical factors is OPEC.
The Birth of OPEC
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is a permanent, intergovernmental Organization created at the Baghdad Conference on September 10–14, 1960, by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela.
Before the OPEC, the Seven Sisters (E Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, Gulf Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Socony, Standard Oil Company of New York, and Texaco) controlled the world's oil markets.
In the 1950s, coal was the most critical fuel globally, but oil consumption increased rapidly, and demand continued to grow. In 1959, the United States' Seven Sisters lowered the price of oil produced in Venezuela and the Middle East by 10% to reduce the United States' price.
To counter the U.S. oil monopoly, OPEC was born.
OPEC's 13 members control approximately 30% of global oil supplies and 79.4% of proven reserves. OPEC member nations produce about 42% of the world's crude oil, and OPEC's oil exports account for roughly 60% of the total petroleum traded worldwide.

Photo: OPEC
Impact of OPEC on Oil Prices
Within the OPEC group, Saudi Arabia is the largest crude oil producer in the world and remains the most dominant member of OPEC, with each instance of a cut in oil production by them, resulting in a sharp rise in oil prices, and vice versa.
Additionally, the 'kingdom of Saud' is also the leading exporter of crude oil globally. Since 2000, all historical instances since the 1973 Arab oil embargo indicate that Saudi Arabia has maintained its upper hand in the oil market. It calls the shots in determining crude oil prices by controlling supply.
All major oil price fluctuations in recent history can be clearly attributed to production levels from Saudi Arabia, along with other OPEC nations.
Is it now the end of OPEC?
The success of shale oil and the plunge in oil prices in 2014 are signs that OPEC has declined.
Since 2014, U.S. shale oil has created a boom in domestic crude oil production. Shale oil comprises more than a third of the onshore production of crude oil in the lower 48 states. It drove U.S. oil output from 8.8 million barrels per day in 2014 to a record 12.2 million barrels a day in 2019.
As a result, the United States became the world's largest crude-oil producer.

Photo: EIA

Photo: EIA
Today the U.S., Saudi Arabia, and Russia rank among the top three in world oil production.

Photo: EIA

Photo: EIA

In November 2014, despite the appeals of other OPEC members to cut production, Saudi Arabia suddenly increased production sharply, trying to defeat U.S. shale oil companies through the competitive increase in OPEC member states. But American shale oil survived strongly by borrowing, and it became more efficient, and production costs were greatly reduced.
During this time, Saudi Arabia's economy is declining rapidly. Saudi Arabia had the highest government deficit in history-98 billion U.S. dollars, accounting for 15% of GDP in 2015.
In 2016, Saudi Arabia led OPEC and Russia to reach an OPEC+ production reduction agreement. Since then, oil prices have steadily rebounded. At the same time, Saudi Arabia has begun to consider taking advantage of high oil prices to list Saudi Aramco to ease domestic financial difficulties.
During this period, OPEC +'s reduction in production has rescued U.S. shale oil again. The production capacity of shale oil has increased sharply by 4 million barrels per day, surpassing Saudi Arabia, and Russia.
So far, the OPEC structure and cohesion continues to divide and elude.
On 8th March 2020, Saudi Arabia initiated a price war with Russia, facilitating a 65% quarterly fall in the price of oil. The price war was triggered by a break-up in dialogue between the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and Russia over proposed oil-production cuts in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Russia walked out of the agreement, leading to the fall of the OPEC+ alliance.
While past oil shocks have been driven by either supply or demand, the price collapse of 2020 is highly unusual in oil market history: It results from a massive demand shock and a huge supply overhang at the same time.


https://preview.redd.it/2smucmlke1n51.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=63932270640be1913c8d41214418073a57b1646a

https://preview.redd.it/34m0nn3me1n51.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=6519e7614205955da1fe6b02437048ec461249dc
For more information please download “TOP 1 Markets” at APP store or google play.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.top1.trading.forex.commodity.cryptocurrency.indices
top1markets:
https://itunes.apple.com/my/app/id1461741702
top one:
https://itunes.apple.com/tw/app/id1506200136
submitted by top1markets to u/top1markets [link] [comments]

Trump Didn’t Kill the Global Trade System. He Split It in Two.

This article is taken from the Wall Street Journal written about nine months ago and sits behind a a paywall, so I decided to copy and paste it here. This article explains Trump's policies toward global trade and what has actually happened so far. I think the article does a decent job of explaining the Trade War. While alot has happenedsince the article was written, I still think its relevant.
However, what is lacking in the article, like many articles on the trade war, is it doesn't really explain the history of US trade policy, the laws that the US administration is using to place tariffs on China and the official justification for the US President in enacting tariffs against China. In my analysis I will cover those points.

SUMMARY

When Trump entered the White House people feared he would dismantle the global system the US and its allies had built over the last 75 years, but he hasn't. He has realign into two systems. One between the US and its allies which looks similar to the one built since the 1980s with a few of quota and tariffs. As the article points out
Today, Korus and Nafta have been replaced by updated agreements(one not yet ratified) that look much like the originals. South Korea accepted quotas on steel. Mexico and Canada agreed to higher wages, North American content requirements and quotas for autos. Furthermore, the article points out Douglas Irwin, an economist and trade historian at Dartmouth College, calls these results the “status quo with Trumpian tweaks: a little more managed trade sprinkled about for favored industries. It’s not good, but it’s not the destruction of the system.” Mr. Trump’s actions so far affect only 12% of U.S. imports, according to Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics. In 1984, 21% of imports were covered by similar restraints, many imposed by Mr. Reagan, such as on cars, steel, motorcycles and clothing. Protectionist instincts go so far in the US, there are strong lobby groups for both protectionist and freetrade in the US.
The second reflects a emerging rivalry between the US and China. Undo some of the integration that followed China accession to the WTO. Two questions 1) How far is the US willing to decouple with China 2) Can it persuade allies to join.
The second is going to be difficult because China's economic ties are greater than they were between the Soviets, and China isn't waging an ideological struggle. Trump lacks Reagan commitment to alliance and free trade. The status quo with China is crumbling Dan Sullivan, a Republican senator from Alaska, personifies these broader forces reshaping the U.S. approach to the world. When Mr. Xi visited the U.S. in 2015, Mr. Sullivan urged his colleagues to pay more attention to China’s rise. On the Senate floor, he quoted the political scientist Graham Allison: “War between the U.S. and China is more likely than recognized at the moment.” Last spring, Mr. Sullivan went to China and met officials including Vice President Wang Qishan. They seemed to think tensions with the U.S. will fade after Mr. Trump leaves the scene, Mr. Sullivan recalled. “I just said, ‘You are completely misreading this.’” The mistrust, he told them, is bipartisan, and will outlast Mr. Trump. both Bush II and Obama tried to change dialogue and engagement, but by the end of his term, Obama was questioning the approach. Trump has declared engagement. “We don’t like it when our allies steal our ideas either, but it’s a much less dangerous situation,” said Derek Scissors, a China expert at the American Enterprise Institute whose views align with the administration’s more hawkish officials. “We’re not worried about the war-fighting capability of Japan and Korea because they’re our friends.”
The article also points out unlike George Kennan in 1946 who made a case for containing the Soviet Union, the US hasn't explicitly made a case for containing the Soviets, Trump's administration hasn't, because as the the article explains its divided Michael Pillsbury a Hudson Institute scholar close to the Trump team, see 3 scenarios
Pillsbury thinks the third is most likely to happen, even though the administration hasn't said that it has adopted that policy. The US is stepping efforts to draw in other trading partners. The US, EU and Japan have launched a WTO effort to crack down on domestic subsidies and technology transfers requirement. US and Domestic concerns with prompted some countries to restrict Huawei. The US is also seeking to walloff China from other trade deals. However, there are risk with this strategy

ARTICLE

Trump Didn’t Kill the Global Trade System. He Split It in Two.

INTRODUCTION

My main criticism of this article is it tries like the vast majority of articles to fit US trade actions in the larger context of US geopolitical strategy. Even the author isn't certain "The first goes to the heart of Mr. Trump’s goal. If his aim is to hold back China’s advance, economists predict he will fail.". If you try to treat the trade "war" and US geopolitical strategy toward China as one, you will find yourself quickly frustrated and confused. If you treat them separately with their different set of stakeholders and histories, were they intersect with regards to China, but diverge. During the Cold War, trade policy toward the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc was subordinated to geopolitical concerns. For Trump, the trade issues are more important than geopolitical strategy. His protectionist trade rhetoric has been fairly consistent since 1980s. In his administration, the top cabinet members holding economic portfolios, those of Commerce, Treasury and US Trade Representative are the same people he picked when he first took office. The Director of the Economic Council has changed hands once, its role isn't as important as the National Security Advisor. While State, Defense, CIA, Homeland Security, UN Ambassador, National Security Advisor have changed hands at least once. Only the Director of National Intelligence hasn't changed.
International Trade makes up 1/4 of the US economy, and like national security its primarily the responsibility of the Federal government. States in the US don't implement their own tariffs. If you add the impact of Treasury policy and how it relates to capital flows in and out of the US, the amounts easily exceed the size of the US economy. Furthermore, because of US Dollar role as the reserve currency and US control of over global system the impact of Treasury are global. Trade policy and investment flows runs through two federal departments Commerce and Treasury and for trade also USTR. Defense spending makes up 3.3% of GDP, and if you add in related homeland security its at most 4%. Why would anyone assume that these two realms be integrated let alone trade policy subordinate to whims of a national security bureaucracy in most instances? With North Korea or Iran, trade and investment subordinate themselves to national security, because to Treasury and Commerce bureaucrats and their affiliated interest groups, Iran and the DPRK are well, economic midgets, but China is a different matter.
The analysis will be divided into four sections. The first will be to provide a brief overview of US trade policy since 1914. The second section will discuss why the US is going after China on trade issues, and why the US has resorted using a bilateral approach as opposed to going through the WTO. The third section we will talk about how relations with China is hashed out in the US.
The reason why I submitted this article, because there aren't many post trying to explain US-China Trade War from a trade perspective. Here is a post titled "What is the Reasons for America's Trade War with China, and not one person mentioned Article 301 or China's WTO Commitments. You get numerous post saying that Huawei is at heart of the trade war. Its fine, but if you don't know what was inside the USTR Investigative report that lead to the tariffs. its like skipping dinner and only having dessert When the US President, Donald J Trump, says he wants to negotiate a better trade deal with other countries, and has been going on about for the last 35 years, longer than many of you have been alive, why do people think that the key issues with China aren't primarily about trade at the moment.

OVERVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE ORIENTATION

Before 1940s, the US could be categorized as a free market protectionist economy. For many this may seem like oxymoron, how can an economy be free market and protectionist? In 1913, government spending made up about 7.5% of US GDP, in the UK it was 13%, and for Germany 18% (Public Spending in the 20th Century A Global Perspective: Ludger Schuknecht and Vito Tanzi - 2000). UK had virtual zero tariffs, while for manufactured goods in France it was 20%, 13% Germany, 9% Belgium and 4% Netherlands. For raw materials and agricultural products, it was almost zero. In contrast, for the likes of United States, Russia and Japan it was 44%, 84% and 30% respectively. Even though in 1900 United States was an economic powerhouse along with Germany, manufactured exports only made up 30% of exports, and the US government saw tariffs as exclusively a domestic policy matter and didn't see tariffs as something to be negotiated with other nations. The US didn't have the large constituency to push the government for lower tariffs abroad for their exports like in Britain in the 1830-40s (Reluctant Partners: A History of Multilateral Trade Cooperation, 1850-2000).
The Underwood Tariffs Act of 1913 which legislated the income tax, dropped the tariffs to 1850 levels levels.Until 16th amendment was ratified in 1913 making income tax legal, all US federal revenue came from excise and tariffs. In contrast before 1914, about 50% of UK revenue came from income taxes. The reason for US reluctance to introduced income tax was ideological and the United State's relative weak government compared to those in Europe. After the First World War, the US introduced the Emergency Tariff Act of 1921, than the Fordney–McCumber Tariff of 1922 followed by a Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930. Contrary to popular opinion, the Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930 had a small negative impact on the economy, since imports and exports played a small part of the US economy, and the tariffs were lower than the average that existed from 1850-1914.
Immediately after the Second World War, when the US economy was the only industrialized economy left standing, the economic focus was on rehabilitation and monetary stability. There was no grandiose and ideological design. Bretton Woods system linked the US dollar to gold to create monetary stability, and to avoid competitive devaluation and tariffs that plagued the world economy after Britain took itself off the gold in 1931. The US$ was the natural choice, because in 1944 2/3 of the world's gold was in the US. One reason why the Marshall Plan was created was to alleviate the chronic deficits Europeans countries had with the US between 1945-50. It was to rebuild their economies so they could start exports good to the US. Even before it was full implemented in 1959, it was already facing problems, the trade surpluses that the US was running in the 1940s, turned to deficits as European and Japanese economies recovered. By 1959, Federal Reserves foreign liabilities had already exceeded its gold reserves. There were fears of a run on the US gold supply and arbitrage. A secondary policy of the Bretton woods system was curbs on capital outflows to reduce speculation on currency pegs, and this had a negative impact on foreign investment until it was abandoned in 1971. It wasn't until the 1980s, where foreign investment recovered to levels prior to 1914. Factoring out the big spike in global oil prices as a result of the OPEC cartel, it most likely wasn't until the mid-1990s that exports as a % of GDP had reached 1914 levels.
Until the 1980s, the US record regarding free trade and markets was mediocre. The impetus to remove trade barriers in Europe after the Second World War was driven by the Europeans themselves. The EEC already had a custom union in 1968, Canada and the US have yet to even discuss implementing one. Even with Canada it took the US over 50 years to get a Free Trade Agreement. NAFTA was inspired by the success of the EEC. NAFTA was very much an elite driven project. If the Americans put the NAFTA to a referendum like the British did with the EEC in the seventies, it most likely wouldn't pass. People often look at segregation in the US South as a political issue, but it was economic issue as well. How could the US preach free trade, when it didn't have free trade in its own country. Segregation was a internal non-tariff barrier. In the first election after the end of the Cold War in 1992, Ross Perot' based most of independent run for the Presidency on opposition to NAFTA. He won 19% of the vote. Like Ross Perot before him, Donald Trump is not the exception in how America has handled tariffs since the founding of the Republic, but more the norm.
The embrace of free trade by the business and political elite can be attributed to two events. After the end of Bretton Woods in 1971, a strong vested interest in the US in the form of multinationals and Wall Street emerged advocating for removal of tariffs and more importantly the removal of restrictions on free flow of capital, whether direct foreign investment in portfolio investment. However, the political class embrace of free trade and capital only really took off after the collapse of the Soviet Union propelled by Cold War triumphalism.
As mentioned by the article, the US is reverting back to a pre-WTO relations with China. As Robert Lighthizer said in speech in 2000
I guess my prescription, really, is to move back to more of a negotiating kind of a settlement. Return to WTO and what it really was meant to be. Something where you have somebody make a decision but have it not be binding.
The US is using financial and legal instruments developed during the Cold War like its extradition treaties (with Canada and Europe), and Section 301. Here is a very good recent article about enforcement commitment that China will make.‘Painful’ enforcement ahead for China if trade war deal is reached with US insisting on unilateral terms
NOTE: It is very difficult to talk about US-China trade war without a basic knowledge of global economic history since 1914. What a lot of people do is politicize or subordinate the economic history to the political. Some commentators think US power was just handed to them after the Second World War, when the US was the only industrialized economy left standing. The dominant position of the US was temporary and in reality its like having 10 tonnes of Gold sitting in your house, it doesn't automatically translate to influence. The US from 1945-1989 was slowly and gradually build her influence in the non-Communist world. For example, US influence in Canada in the 1960s wasn't as strong as it is now. Only 50% of Canadian exports went to the US in 1960s vs 80% at the present moment.

BASIS OF THE US TRADE DISCUSSION WITH CHINA

According to preliminary agreement between China and the US based on unnamed sources in the Wall Street Journal article US, China close in on Trade Deal. In this article it divides the deal in two sections. The first aspects have largely to do with deficits and is political.
As part of a deal, China is pledging to help level the playing field, including speeding up the timetable for removing foreign-ownership limitations on car ventures and reducing tariffs on imported vehicles to below the current auto tariff of 15%. Beijing would also step up purchases of U.S. goods—a tactic designed to appeal to President Trump, who campaigned on closing the bilateral trade deficit with China. One of the sweeteners would be an $18 billion natural-gas purchase from Cheniere Energy Inc., people familiar with the transaction said.
The second part will involve the following.
  1. Commitment Regarding Industrial Policy
  2. Provisions to protect IP
  3. Mechanism which complaints by US companies can be addressed
  4. Bilateral meetings adjudicate disputes. If talks don't produce agreement than US can raise tariffs unilaterally
This grouping of conditions is similar to the points filled under the 301 investigation which serve the basis for initiating the tariffs. I have been reading some sources that say this discussion on this second group of broader issues could only be finalized later
The official justifications for placing the tariffs on Chinese goods is found under the March 2018 investigation submitted by the office of the President to Congress titled FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO CHINA’S ACTS, POLICIES, AND PRACTICES RELATED TO TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND INNOVATION UNDER SECTION 301 OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974. From this investigation the United States Trade Representative (USTR) place US Tariffs on Chinese goods as per Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. Here is a press release by the USTR listing the reasons for placing tariffs, and the key section from the press release. Specifically, the Section 301 investigation revealed:
In the bigger context of trade relations between US and China, China is not honoring its WTO commitments, and the USTR issued its yearly report to Congress in early February about the status of China compliance with its WTO commitments. The points that served as a basis for applying Section 301, also deviate from her commitments as Clinton's Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky paving the way for a trade war. Barshefsky argues that China's back sliding was happening as early as 2006-07, and believes the trade war could have been avoided has those commitments been enforced by previous administrations.
I will provide a brief overview of WTO membership and China's process of getting into the WTO.
WTO members can be divided into two groups, first are countries that joined in 1995-97, and were members of GATT, than there are the second group that joined after 1997. China joined in 2001. There is an argument that when China joined in 2001, she faced more stringent conditions than other developing countries that joined before, because the vast majority of developing countries were members of GATT, and were admitted to the WTO based on that previous membership in GATT. Here is Brookings Institute article published in 2001 titled "Issues in China’s WTO Accession"
This question is all the more puzzling because the scope and depth of demands placed on entrants into the formal international trading system have increased substantially since the formal conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations in 1994, which expanded the agenda considerably by covering many services, agriculture, intellectual property, and certain aspects of foreign direct investment. Since 1994, the international community has added agreements covering information technology, basic telecommunications services, and financial services. WTO membership now entails liberalization of a much broader range of domestic economic activity, including areas that traditionally have been regarded by most countries as among the most sensitive, than was required of countries entering the WTO’s predecessor organization the GATT.
The terms of China’s protocol of accession to the World Trade Organization reflect the developments just described and more. China’s market access commitments are much more far-reaching than those that governed the accession of countries only a decade ago. And, as a condition for membership, China was required to make protocol commitments that substantially exceed those made by any other member of the World Trade Organization, including those that have joined since 1995. The broader and deeper commitments China has made inevitably will entail substantial short-term economic costs.
What are the WTO commitments Barshefsky goes on about? When countries join the WTO, particularly those countries that weren't members of GATT and joined after 1997, they have to work toward fulfilling certain commitments. There are 4 key documents when countries make an accession to WTO membership, the working party report, the accession protocol paper, the goods schedule and service schedule.
In the working party report as part of the conclusion which specifies the commitment of each member country what they will do in areas that aren't compliant with WTO regulations on the date they joined. The problem there is no good enforcement mechanism for other members to force China to comply with these commitments. And WTO punishments are weak.
Here is the commitment paragraph for China
"The Working Party took note of the explanations and statements of China concerning its foreign trade regime, as reflected in this Report. The Working Party took note of the commitments given by China in relation to certain specific matters which are reproduced in paragraphs 18-19, 22-23, 35-36, 40, 42, 46-47, 49, 60, 62, 64, 68, 70, 73, 75, 78-79, 83-84, 86, 91-93, 96, 100-103, 107, 111, 115-117, 119-120, 122-123, 126-132, 136, 138, 140, 143, 145, 146, 148, 152, 154, 157, 162, 165, 167-168, 170-174, 177-178, 180, 182, 184-185, 187, 190-197, 199-200, 203-207, 210, 212-213, 215, 217, 222-223, 225, 227-228, 231-235, 238, 240-242, 252, 256, 259, 263, 265, 270, 275, 284, 286, 288, 291, 292, 296, 299, 302, 304-305, 307-310, 312-318, 320, 322, 331-334, 336, 339 and 341 of this Report and noted that these commitments are incorporated in paragraph 1.2 of the Draft Protocol. "
This is a tool by the WTO that list all the WTO commitment of each country in the working paper. In the goods and service schedule they have commitments for particular sectors. Here is the a press release by the WTO in September 2001, after successfully concluding talks for accession, and brief summary of key areas in which China hasn't fulfilled her commitments. Most of the commitments made by China were made to address its legacy as a non-market economy and involvement of state owned enterprises. In my opinion, I think the US government and investors grew increasingly frustrated with China, after 2007 not just because of China's back sliding, but relative to other countries who joined after 1997 like Vietnam, another non-market Leninist dictatorship. When comparing China's commitments to the WTO its best to compare her progress with those that joined after 1997, which were mostly ex-Soviet Republics.
NOTE: The Chinese media have for two decades compared any time the US has talked about China's currency manipulation or any other issue as a pretext for imposing tariffs on China to the Plaza Accords. I am very sure people will raise it here. My criticism of this view is fourfold. First, the US targeted not just Japan, but France, Britain and the UK as well. Secondly, the causes of the Japan lost decade were due largely to internal factors. Thirdly, Japan, UK, Britain and France in the 1980s, the Yuan isn't undervalued today. Lastly, in the USTR investigation, its China's practices that are the concern, not so much the trade deficit.

REASONS FOR TRUMPS UNILATERAL APPROACH

I feel that people shouldn't dismiss Trump's unilateral approach toward China for several reasons.
  1. The multilateral approach won't work in many issues such as the trade deficit, commercial espionage and intellectual property, because US and her allies have different interest with regard to these issues. Germany and Japan and trade surpluses with China, while the US runs a deficit. In order to reach a consensus means the West has to compromise among themselves, and the end result if the type of toothless resolutions you commonly find in ASEAN regarding the SCS. Does America want to "compromise" its interest to appease a politician like Justin Trudeau? Not to mention opposition from domestic interest. TPP was opposed by both Clinton and Trump during the election.
  2. You can't launch a geopolitical front against China using a newly formed trade block like the TPP. Some of the existing TPP members are in economic groups with China, like Malaysia and Australia.
  3. China has joined a multitude of international bodies, and at least in trade, these bodies haven't changed its behavior.
  4. Dealing with China, its a no win situation whether you use a tough multilateral / unilateral approach. If the US endorse a tough unilateral approach gives the impression that the US is acting like the British during the Opium War. If you take a concerted Western approach you are accused of acting like the 8 Powers Alliance in 1900.
  5. Trump was elected to deal with China which he and his supporters believe was responsible for the loss of millions manufacturing jobs when China joined the WTO in 2001. It is estimate the US lost 6 Million jobs, about 1/4 of US manufacturing Jobs. This has been subsequently advanced by some economists. The ball got rolling when Bill Clinton decided to grant China Most Favored Nation status in 1999, just a decade after Tiananmen.
  6. China hasn't dealt with issues like IP protection, market access, subsidies to state own companies and state funded industrial spying.
To his credit, Trump has said his aim was not to overthrow authoritarian governments, and that even applies to the likes of Iran. The Arab spring scared Russia and China, because the US for a brief moment placed the spread of democracy over its security interest.

UNDERSTANDING HOW THE US MAKES DECISIONS REGARDING CHINA

At this moment, China or the trade war isn't an area of great concern for the American public, among international issues it ranks lower than international terrorism, North Korea and Iran's nuclear program.
According to the survey, 39 percent of the country views China’s growing power as a “critical threat” to Americans. That ranked it only eighth among 12 potential threats listed and placed China well behind the perceived threats from international terrorism (66 percent), North Korea’s nuclear program (59 percent) and Iran’s nuclear program (52 percent). It’s also considerably lower than when the same question was asked during the 1990s, when more than half of those polled listed China as a critical threat. That broadly tracks with a recent poll from the Pew Research Center that found concern about U.S.-China economic issues had decreased since 2012.
In looking at how US conducts relations foreign policy with China, we should look at it from the three areas of most concern - economic, national security and ideology. Each sphere has their interest groups, and sometimes groups can occupy two spheres at once. Security experts are concerned with some aspects of China's economic actions like IP theft and industrial policy (China 2025), because they are related to security. In these sphere there are your hawks and dove. And each sphere is dominated by certain interest groups. That is why US policy toward China can often appear contradictory. You have Trump want to reduce the trade deficit, but security experts advocating for restrictions on dual use technology who are buttressed by people who want export restrictions on China, as a way of getting market access.
Right now the economic concerns are most dominant, and the hawks seem to dominate. The economic hawks traditionally have been domestic manufacturing companies and economic nationalist. In reality the hawks aren't dominant, but the groups like US Companies with large investment in China and Wall Street are no longer defending China, and some have turned hawkish against China. These US companies are the main conduit in which China's lobby Congress, since China only spends 50% of what Taiwan spends lobbying Congress.
THE ANGLO SAXON WORLD AND CHINA
I don't think many Chinese even those that speak English, have a good understanding Anglo-Saxon society mindset. Anglo Saxons countries, whether US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland are commerce driven society governed by sanctity of contracts. The English great philosophical contributions to Western philosophy have primarily to do with economics and politics like Adam Smith, John Locke, David Hume and Thomas Hobbes. This contrast with the French and Germans. Politics in the UK and to a lesser extent the US, is centered around economics, while in Mainland Europe its religion. When the Americans revolted against the British Empire in 1776, the initial source of the grievances were taxes.
Outside of East Asia, the rest of the World's relationship with China was largely commercial, and for United States, being an Anglosaxon country, even more so. In Southeast Asia, Chinese aren't known for high culture, but for trade and commerce. Outside Vietnam, most of Chinese loans words in Southeast Asian languages involve either food or money. The influence is akin to Yiddish in English.
Some people point to the Mao and Nixon meeting as great strategic breakthrough and symbol of what great power politics should look like. The reality is that the Mao-Nixon meeting was an anomaly in the long history of relations with China and the West. Much of China-Western relations over the last 500 years was conducted by multitudes of nameless Chinese and Western traders. The period from 1949-1979 was the only period were strategic concerns triumphed trade, because China had little to offer except instability and revolution. Even in this period, China's attempt to spread revolution in Southeast Asia was a threat to Western investments and corporate interest in the region. During the nadir of both the Qing Dynasty and Republican period, China was still engaged in its traditional commercial role. Throughout much of history of their relations with China, the goals of Britain and the United States were primarily economic,
IMAGINE JUST 10% OF CHINA BOUGHT MY PRODUCT
From the beginning, the allure of China to Western businesses and traders has been its sheer size I. One of the points that the USTR mentions is lack of market access for US companies operating in China, while Chinese companies face much less restrictions operating in the US.
This is supported by remarks by Henry Paulson and Charlene Barshefsky. As Paulson remarked
Trade with China has hurt some American workers. And they have expressed their grievances at the ballot box.
So while many attribute this shift to the Trump Administration, I do not. What we are now seeing will likely endure for some time within the American policy establishment. China is viewed—by a growing consensus—not just as a strategic challenge to the United States but as a country whose rise has come at America’s expense. In this environment, it would be helpful if the US-China relationship had more advocates. That it does not reflects another failure:
In large part because China has been slow to open its economy since it joined the WTO, the American business community has turned from advocate to skeptic and even opponent of past US policies toward China. American business doesn’t want a tariff war but it does want a more aggressive approach from our government. How can it be that those who know China best, work there, do business there, make money there, and have advocated for productive relations in the past, are among those now arguing for more confrontation? The answer lies in the story of stalled competition policy, and the slow pace of opening, over nearly two decades. This has discouraged and fragmented the American business community. And it has reinforced the negative attitudinal shift among our political and expert classes. In short, even though many American businesses continue to prosper in China, a growing number of firms have given up hope that the playing field will ever be level. Some have accepted the Faustian bargain of maximizing today’s earnings per share while operating under restrictions that jeopardize their future competitiveness. But that doesn’t mean they’re happy about it. Nor does it mean they aren’t acutely aware of the risks — or thinking harder than ever before about how to diversify their risks away from, and beyond, China.
What is interesting about Paulson's speech is he spend only one sentence about displaced US workers, and a whole paragraph about US business operating in China. While Kissinger writes books about China, how much does he contribute to both Democrats and the Republicans during the election cycle? China is increasingly makING it more difficult for US companies operating and those exporting products to China.

CONTINUED

submitted by weilim to IntlScholars [link] [comments]

CRYPTOCURRENCY BITCOIN

CRYPTOCURRENCY BITCOIN
Bitcoin Table of contents expand: 1. What is Bitcoin? 2. Understanding Bitcoin 3. How Bitcoin Works 4. What's a Bitcoin Worth? 5. How Bitcoin Began 6. Who Invented Bitcoin? 7. Before Satoshi 8. Why Is Satoshi Anonymous? 9. The Suspects 10. Can Satoshi's Identity Be Proven? 11. Receiving Bitcoins As Payment 12. Working For Bitcoins 13. Bitcoin From Interest Payments 14. Bitcoins From Gambling 15. Investing in Bitcoins 16. Risks of Bitcoin Investing 17. Bitcoin Regulatory Risk 18. Security Risk of Bitcoins 19. Insurance Risk 20. Risk of Bitcoin Fraud 21. Market Risk 22. Bitcoin's Tax Risk What is Bitcoin?
Bitcoin is a digital currency created in January 2009. It follows the ideas set out in a white paper by the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto, whose true identity is yet to be verified. Bitcoin offers the promise of lower transaction fees than traditional online payment mechanisms and is operated by a decentralized authority, unlike government-issued currencies.
There are no physical bitcoins, only balances kept on a public ledger in the cloud, that – along with all Bitcoin transactions – is verified by a massive amount of computing power. Bitcoins are not issued or backed by any banks or governments, nor are individual bitcoins valuable as a commodity. Despite it not being legal tender, Bitcoin charts high on popularity, and has triggered the launch of other virtual currencies collectively referred to as Altcoins.
Understanding Bitcoin Bitcoin is a type of cryptocurrency: Balances are kept using public and private "keys," which are long strings of numbers and letters linked through the mathematical encryption algorithm that was used to create them. The public key (comparable to a bank account number) serves as the address which is published to the world and to which others may send bitcoins. The private key (comparable to an ATM PIN) is meant to be a guarded secret and only used to authorize Bitcoin transmissions. Style notes: According to the official Bitcoin Foundation, the word "Bitcoin" is capitalized in the context of referring to the entity or concept, whereas "bitcoin" is written in the lower case when referring to a quantity of the currency (e.g. "I traded 20 bitcoin") or the units themselves. The plural form can be either "bitcoin" or "bitcoins."
How Bitcoin Works Bitcoin is one of the first digital currencies to use peer-to-peer technology to facilitate instant payments. The independent individuals and companies who own the governing computing power and participate in the Bitcoin network, also known as "miners," are motivated by rewards (the release of new bitcoin) and transaction fees paid in bitcoin. These miners can be thought of as the decentralized authority enforcing the credibility of the Bitcoin network. New bitcoin is being released to the miners at a fixed, but periodically declining rate, such that the total supply of bitcoins approaches 21 million. One bitcoin is divisible to eight decimal places (100 millionths of one bitcoin), and this smallest unit is referred to as a Satoshi. If necessary, and if the participating miners accept the change, Bitcoin could eventually be made divisible to even more decimal places. Bitcoin mining is the process through which bitcoins are released to come into circulation. Basically, it involves solving a computationally difficult puzzle to discover a new block, which is added to the blockchain and receiving a reward in the form of a few bitcoins. The block reward was 50 new bitcoins in 2009; it decreases every four years. As more and more bitcoins are created, the difficulty of the mining process – that is, the amount of computing power involved – increases. The mining difficulty began at 1.0 with Bitcoin's debut back in 2009; at the end of the year, it was only 1.18. As of February 2019, the mining difficulty is over 6.06 billion. Once, an ordinary desktop computer sufficed for the mining process; now, to combat the difficulty level, miners must use faster hardware like Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC), more advanced processing units like Graphic Processing Units (GPUs), etc.
What's a Bitcoin Worth? In 2017 alone, the price of Bitcoin rose from a little under $1,000 at the beginning of the year to close to $19,000, ending the year more than 1,400% higher. Bitcoin's price is also quite dependent on the size of its mining network since the larger the network is, the more difficult – and thus more costly – it is to produce new bitcoins. As a result, the price of bitcoin has to increase as its cost of production also rises. The Bitcoin mining network's aggregate power has more than tripled over the past twelve months.
How Bitcoin Began
Aug. 18, 2008: The domain name bitcoin.org is registered. Today, at least, this domain is "WhoisGuard Protected," meaning the identity of the person who registered it is not public information.
Oct. 31, 2008: Someone using the name Satoshi Nakamoto makes an announcement on The Cryptography Mailing list at metzdowd.com: "I've been working on a new electronic cash system that's fully peer-to-peer, with no trusted third party. The paper is available at http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf." This link leads to the now-famous white paper published on bitcoin.org entitled "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System." This paper would become the Magna Carta for how Bitcoin operates today.
Jan. 3, 2009: The first Bitcoin block is mined, Block 0. This is also known as the "genesis block" and contains the text: "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks," perhaps as proof that the block was mined on or after that date, and perhaps also as relevant political commentary.
Jan. 8, 2009: The first version of the Bitcoin software is announced on The Cryptography Mailing list.
Jan. 9, 2009: Block 1 is mined, and Bitcoin mining commences in earnest.
Who Invented Bitcoin?
No one knows. Not conclusively, at any rate. Satoshi Nakamoto is the name associated with the person or group of people who released the original Bitcoin white paper in 2008 and worked on the original Bitcoin software that was released in 2009. The Bitcoin protocol requires users to enter a birthday upon signup, and we know that an individual named Satoshi Nakamoto registered and put down April 5 as a birth date. And that's about it.
Before Satoshi
Though it is tempting to believe the media's spin that Satoshi Nakamoto is a solitary, quixotic genius who created Bitcoin out of thin air, such innovations do not happen in a vacuum. All major scientific discoveries, no matter how original-seeming, were built on previously existing research. There are precursors to Bitcoin: Adam Back’s Hashcash, invented in 1997, and subsequently Wei Dai’s b-money, Nick Szabo’s bit gold and Hal Finney’s Reusable Proof of Work. The Bitcoin white paper itself cites Hashcash and b-money, as well as various other works spanning several research fields.
Why Is Satoshi Anonymous?
There are two primary motivations for keeping Bitcoin's inventor keeping his or her or their identity secret. One is privacy. As Bitcoin has gained in popularity – becoming something of a worldwide phenomenon – Satoshi Nakamoto would likely garner a lot of attention from the media and from governments.
The other reason is safety. Looking at 2009 alone, 32,489 blocks were mined; at the then-reward rate of 50 BTC per block, the total payout in 2009 was 1,624,500 BTC, which at today’s prices is over $900 million. One may conclude that only Satoshi and perhaps a few other people were mining through 2009 and that they possess a majority of that $900 million worth of BTC. Someone in possession of that much BTC could become a target of criminals, especially since bitcoins are less like stocks and more like cash, where the private keys needed to authorize spending could be printed out and literally kept under a mattress. While it's likely the inventor of Bitcoin would take precautions to make any extortion-induced transfers traceable, remaining anonymous is a good way for Satoshi to limit exposure.
The Suspects
Numerous people have been suggested as possible Satoshi Nakamoto by major media outlets. Oct. 10, 2011, The New Yorker published an article speculating that Nakamoto might be Irish cryptography student Michael Clear or economic sociologist Vili Lehdonvirta. A day later, Fast Company suggested that Nakamoto could be a group of three people – Neal King, Vladimir Oksman and Charles Bry – who together appear on a patent related to secure communications that were filed two months before bitcoin.org was registered. A Vice article published in May 2013 added more suspects to the list, including Gavin Andresen, the Bitcoin project’s lead developer; Jed McCaleb, co-founder of now-defunct Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox; and famed Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki.
In December 2013, Techcrunch published an interview with researcher Skye Grey who claimed textual analysis of published writings shows a link between Satoshi and bit-gold creator Nick Szabo. And perhaps most famously, in March 2014, Newsweek ran a cover article claiming that Satoshi is actually an individual named Satoshi Nakamoto – a 64-year-old Japanese-American engineer living in California. The list of suspects is long, and all the individuals deny being Satoshi.
Can Satoshi's Identity Be Proven?
It would seem even early collaborators on the project don’t have verifiable proof of Satoshi’s identity. To reveal conclusively who Satoshi Nakamoto is, a definitive link would need to be made between his/her activity with Bitcoin and his/her identity. That could come in the form of linking the party behind the domain registration of bitcoin.org, email and forum accounts used by Satoshi Nakamoto, or ownership of some portion of the earliest mined bitcoins. Even though the bitcoins Satoshi likely possesses are traceable on the blockchain, it seems he/she has yet to cash them out in a way that reveals his/her identity. If Satoshi were to move his/her bitcoins to an exchange today, this might attract attention, but it seems unlikely that a well-funded and successful exchange would betray a customer's privacy.
Receiving Bitcoins As Payment
Bitcoins can be accepted as a means of payment for products sold or services provided. If you have a brick and mortar store, just display a sign saying “Bitcoin Accepted Here” and many of your customers may well take you up on it; the transactions can be handled with the requisite hardware terminal or wallet address through QR codes and touch screen apps. An online business can easily accept bitcoins by just adding this payment option to the others it offers, like credit cards, PayPal, etc. Online payments will require a Bitcoin merchant tool (an external processor like Coinbase or BitPay).
Working For Bitcoins
Those who are self-employed can get paid for a job in bitcoins. There are several websites/job boards which are dedicated to the digital currency:
Work For Bitcoin brings together work seekers and prospective employers through its websiteCoinality features jobs – freelance, part-time and full-time – that offer payment in bitcoins, as well as Dogecoin and LitecoinJobs4Bitcoins, part of reddit.comBitGigs
Bitcoin From Interest Payments
Another interesting way (literally) to earn bitcoins is by lending them out and being repaid in the currency. Lending can take three forms – direct lending to someone you know; through a website which facilitates peer-to-peer transactions, pairing borrowers and lenders; or depositing bitcoins in a virtual bank that offers a certain interest rate for Bitcoin accounts. Some such sites are Bitbond, BitLendingClub, and BTCjam. Obviously, you should do due diligence on any third-party site.
Bitcoins From Gambling
It’s possible to play at casinos that cater to Bitcoin aficionados, with options like online lotteries, jackpots, spread betting, and other games. Of course, the pros and cons and risks that apply to any sort of gambling and betting endeavors are in force here too.
Investing in Bitcoins
There are many Bitcoin supporters who believe that digital currency is the future. Those who endorse it are of the view that it facilitates a much faster, no-fee payment system for transactions across the globe. Although it is not itself any backed by any government or central bank, bitcoin can be exchanged for traditional currencies; in fact, its exchange rate against the dollar attracts potential investors and traders interested in currency plays. Indeed, one of the primary reasons for the growth of digital currencies like Bitcoin is that they can act as an alternative to national fiat money and traditional commodities like gold.
In March 2014, the IRS stated that all virtual currencies, including bitcoins, would be taxed as property rather than currency. Gains or losses from bitcoins held as capital will be realized as capital gains or losses, while bitcoins held as inventory will incur ordinary gains or losses.
Like any other asset, the principle of buying low and selling high applies to bitcoins. The most popular way of amassing the currency is through buying on a Bitcoin exchange, but there are many other ways to earn and own bitcoins. Here are a few options which Bitcoin enthusiasts can explore.
Risks of Bitcoin Investing
Though Bitcoin was not designed as a normal equity investment (no shares have been issued), some speculative investors were drawn to the digital money after it appreciated rapidly in May 2011 and again in November 2013. Thus, many people purchase bitcoin for its investment value rather than as a medium of exchange.
However, their lack of guaranteed value and digital nature means the purchase and use of bitcoins carries several inherent risks. Many investor alerts have been issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and other agencies.
The concept of a virtual currency is still novel and, compared to traditional investments, Bitcoin doesn't have much of a long-term track record or history of credibility to back it. With their increasing use, bitcoins are becoming less experimental every day, of course; still, after eight years, they (like all digital currencies) remain in a development phase, still evolving. "It is pretty much the highest-risk, highest-return investment that you can possibly make,” says Barry Silbert, CEO of Digital Currency Group, which builds and invests in Bitcoin and blockchain companies.
Bitcoin Regulatory Risk
Investing money into Bitcoin in any of its many guises is not for the risk-averse. Bitcoins are a rival to government currency and may be used for black market transactions, money laundering, illegal activities or tax evasion. As a result, governments may seek to regulate, restrict or ban the use and sale of bitcoins, and some already have. Others are coming up with various rules. For example, in 2015, the New York State Department of Financial Services finalized regulations that would require companies dealing with the buy, sell, transfer or storage of bitcoins to record the identity of customers, have a compliance officer and maintain capital reserves. The transactions worth $10,000 or more will have to be recorded and reported.
Although more agencies will follow suit, issuing rules and guidelines, the lack of uniform regulations about bitcoins (and other virtual currency) raises questions over their longevity, liquidity, and universality.
Security Risk of Bitcoins
Bitcoin exchanges are entirely digital and, as with any virtual system, are at risk from hackers, malware and operational glitches. If a thief gains access to a Bitcoin owner's computer hard drive and steals his private encryption key, he could transfer the stolen Bitcoins to another account. (Users can prevent this only if bitcoins are stored on a computer which is not connected to the internet, or else by choosing to use a paper wallet – printing out the Bitcoin private keys and addresses, and not keeping them on a computer at all.) Hackers can also target Bitcoin exchanges, gaining access to thousands of accounts and digital wallets where bitcoins are stored. One especially notorious hacking incident took place in 2014, when Mt. Gox, a Bitcoin exchange in Japan, was forced to close down after millions of dollars worth of bitcoins were stolen.
This is particularly problematic once you remember that all Bitcoin transactions are permanent and irreversible. It's like dealing with cash: Any transaction carried out with bitcoins can only be reversed if the person who has received them refunds them. There is no third party or a payment processor, as in the case of a debit or credit card – hence, no source of protection or appeal if there is a problem.
Insurance Risk
Some investments are insured through the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Normal bank accounts are insured through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to a certain amount depending on the jurisdiction. Bitcoin exchanges and Bitcoin accounts are not insured by any type of federal or government program.
Risk of Bitcoin Fraud
While Bitcoin uses private key encryption to verify owners and register transactions, fraudsters and scammers may attempt to sell false bitcoins. For instance, in July 2013, the SEC brought legal action against an operator of a Bitcoin-related Ponzi scheme.
Market Risk
Like with any investment, Bitcoin values can fluctuate. Indeed, the value of the currency has seen wild swings in price over its short existence. Subject to high volume buying and selling on exchanges, it has a high sensitivity to “news." According to the CFPB, the price of bitcoins fell by 61% in a single day in 2013, while the one-day price drop in 2014 has been as big as 80%.
If fewer people begin to accept Bitcoin as a currency, these digital units may lose value and could become worthless. There is already plenty of competition, and though Bitcoin has a huge lead over the other 100-odd digital currencies that have sprung up, thanks to its brand recognition and venture capital money, a technological break-through in the form of a better virtual coin is always a threat.
Bitcoin's Tax Risk
As bitcoin is ineligible to be included in any tax-advantaged retirement accounts, there are no good, legal options to shield investments from taxation.
SPONSORED
Start with ¥3000 trading bonus
Trade forex and CFDs on stock indices, commodities, metals and energies with alicensed and regulated broker. For all clients who open their first real account, XM offers a¥3000 trading bonus to test the XM products and services without any initial deposit needed. Learn more about how you can trade from your PC and Mac, or from a variety of mobile devices.
Compare Investment Accounts
Advertiser Disclosure
Related Terms
Satoshi
The satoshi is the smallest unit of the bitcoin cryptocurrency. It is named after Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of the protocol used in block chains and the bitcoin cryptocurrency.
Chartalism Chartalism is a non-mainstream theory of money that emphasizes the impact of government policies and activities on the value of money.
Satoshi Nakamoto The name used by the unknown creator of the protocol used in the bitcoin cryptocurrency. Satoshi Nakamoto is closely-associated with blockchain technology.
Bitcoin Mining, Explained Breaking down everything you need to know about Bitcoin Mining, from Blockchain and Block Rewards to Proof-of-Work and Mining Pools.
Understanding Bitcoin Unlimited Bitcoin Unlimited is a proposed upgrade to Bitcoin Core that allows larger block sizes. The upgrade is designed to improve transaction speed through scale.
Blockchain Explained
A guide to help you understand what blockchain is and how it can be used by industries. You've probably encountered a definition like this: “blockchain is a distributed, decentralized, public ledger." But blockchain is easier to understand than it sounds.
Top 6 Books to Learn About Bitcoin About UsAdvertiseContactPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCareers Investopedia is part of the Dotdash publishing family.The Balance Lifewire TripSavvy The Spruceand more
By Satoshi Nakamoto
Read it once, go read other crypto stuff, read it again… keep doing this until the whole document makes sense. It’ll take a while, but you’ll get there. This is the original whitepaper introducing and explaining Bitcoin, and there’s really nothing better out there to understand on the subject.
“What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party

submitted by adrian_morrison to BlockchainNews [link] [comments]

[EVENT] Market shock mitigation & stimulus

Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China, Sanlihe, Xicheng District, Beijing
 
Shock Mitigation: Market and Sector Responses
 
Amidst a dip in the normally resilient Chinese economy, analysts and officials have already begun to announce a revised, minor economic stimulus, aiming to to cushion the impact of market turmoil on already sluggish consumption and cushion ongoing trade tensions with the West; a byproduct of a decades long trade war. At the same time, China’s economic growth has slowed to its lowest rate for three decades and private companies, which account for 60 percent of the country’s GDP, have begun to struggle to access the funds they need to survive - as a result of Beijing’s deleveraging campaign, aimed at reducing debt and risky lending since 2020.
Officials cautioned a modest impact from the initial measures on several critical sectors, including export demand which has been damaged by offloading of American contracts, property sales in smaller cities, and passenger car sales, which continue to face strong headwinds.
 
Internal Economic Measures
 
Officials have begun to turn and pull various economic levers and knobs, aiming to boost market confidence, banking on the successful and level course the administration has charted since the beginning of the trade conflict, including having successfully prevented and even boosted capital reserves over the past five years far across the USD $3 trillion mark.
 
 
Yuan Adjustment
 
The Yuan is currently pegged in a "managed floating rate" against the USD at ¥6.2/$1. To ease the pressure on Chinese exporters driven by US tariffs, and to ensure that exports remain competitive especially in critical developing markets - which Beijing is now seeking to dominate, as has been for years - the PBOC has instituted a small change to the managed reference rate. This is not referred to as a devaluation in any way.
 
 
Beijing is looking to quietly engineer a 2pc reduction in the CNY in a single sweep, with a maximum trading rate falling against to ¥7/$1. However, Yang Gi, Deputy Minister of the PBOC, has put out a statement noting:
 
"The assumption that the People's Bank is attempting to engineer a ten percent devaluation is groundless. The volatility in the market is currently under careful control, and is largely in relation to American financial pressures. However, the PBOC stands ready to step in with capital control measures - including forex buybacks of the Yuan - if the market turns sour."
 
Specific Industry Stimulus - Moving Away from America
 
Party officials and Financial deputies have examined at the situation in each of the general tariffed areas excepting automobiles; steel/iron, aluminum, textiles, industrial machinery, and heavy manufacturing. In several cases, demand is incredibly saturated domestically; in others, the addition of SCO/RCEP FTAs and the progress of the Silk Road to Western Asia and Europe have insulated the sectors. However, officials also view this as a chance to rebalance growth in several over-capacitated sectors, a long standing goal, and shift dependence away from the U.S. for good.
 
 
Automotive parts and finished exports have not been given specific attention due to the second part of the package, where reciprocal measures will soon be imposed; leading to the belief that American car parts manufacturers will soon lobby the government to remove the shortsighted 30% duty.
submitted by S01780 to GlobalPowers [link] [comments]

Cointellect Cloud Mining service fine! In fact, "bloggers" are raving over them on this "one weird trick to mine BTC" site (trick = FREE download to mine on your CPU!!!!)

Look you guise! From Cointellect... https://imgur.com/oe63Bqm
ONE WEIRD TRICK TO MINE BITCOIN!!!
MyCoinProject is purportedly a blog of an Englishman documenting his 1500 Euro investment with CoinTellect (why not GBP? Good question!) .
From the "About Me" page:
I am Dominic from the UK, living in Newcastle upon Tyne but originally from small town in the North West of England. I am constantly looking for ways to make additional income on and off the internet and have done so for many years with mixed success.
I am a big believer of not keeping money in the bank! who wants to make 1-3% interest/year whilst they loan your money out to make huge returns? This is why rather than saving long term, I’m currently investing in CoIntellect.
This project is my documented journey into investing into mining doge coin through CoIintellect. I will be investing my hard earned money into mining doge coin by using a cloud based hashing provider called CoIintellect and documenting the results for the world to see. I will also be posting ‘info videos’ to cover how to invest yourself should you wish to join me in what I hope to be a profitable adventure. Its super easy!
Does that feel like an advertisement to anyone else?! Not to worry though, Dom adds:
Oh and one more thing before you ask, I don’t work for CoIntellect nor am I affiliated with them in anyway besides being one of their many customers.
This would be hilarious if it wasn't for the numerous death threats people got for posting in response to this question on StackExchange last November:
And of course, we have the newest entry in "Dom's blog": http://mycoinproject.com/2015/02/09/euston-we-have-a-problem/
Today Cointellect announced that in recent light of the declining bitcoin price that current mining earnings have been re-addressed. Earnings have been reduced. My 5 x basic contracts will now be earning a total of 16.6 euro instead of 27.5. This is a big decrease but there are some positives to take away;
Cointellect is not a scam (they would just shut up shop instead of doing this) I will still earn around 500 euro a month for the next 5 months – thats a profit of 1690 euro It is still more profitable than putting your money in the bank New users can still profit (but i would hold off until things become more clear for the path ahead) As any investor you have to take the rough with the smooth, its uncertain if a rise in Bitcoin would change the mining profits but at the time of writing this, it looks uncertain. What I am disappointed about is the lack of forthcoming notice. However as an investor you have to take the rough with the smooth. It’s still more profitable than forex trading and a lot less work. With this in mind yes the reduced earnings suck, but no need to panic.
Here, Dom provides links to Cointellect all over his site: https://cointellectDOTcom/?code=c7ce7ab6
EDIT: I Googled the referral code c7ce7ab6 and found tons of Cointellect "endorsements".
Let's check in on Cointellect's news page!
Published at Feb 9, 2015 4:10:09 PM A'hoy Miners,
We want to begin this announcement with a formal apology for the recent lack of communication. As you can imagine, Bitcoin’s volatile downtrend has put us in a difficult situation and we have been hard at work resolving payout concerns. To help us remain on track, we have decided to roll out support for the mining of additional cryptocurrencies - namely the ASIC resistant coins. Similar to a multi-pool, this will enable us to target the most profitable coins and maximize revenue for all parties.
In anticipation of this change, we will slowly begin to restructure our platform and phase out obsolete contracts. A combination of rising network difficulty and competition are beginning to render many of our introductory contracts futile. While those with recent purchases will continue to receive earnings, the Demo, Starter, and Pilot contracts will eventually be phased out and replaced with variable contracts.
Following our next platform update, earnings from existing contract plans will be revamped to more accurately reflect Bitcoin’s current price. Furthermore, solo-mined earnings will be restricted for use only with contract purchases.
We do want to emphasize that our team understands the frustration and inconveniences these recent changes may pose. Cryptocurrency mining is an unpredictable business with many risks. We do ask our users to remain aware of these risks and approach the industry with reason. As a mining service provider, we are caught in the midst of the recent economic turbulence and have little recourse outside of our recent platform changes. Despite the inconveniences, we are confident our plan of action moving forward is greatly preferable than those of our competitors.
We thank you for your continued understanding during these difficult times.
WHHHAAATTTTTT????? Impossible!
TL;DR: check Cointellect's About Page for the biggest laugh!
submitted by AussieCryptoCurrency to Buttcoin [link] [comments]

#LiQNet

Today I will talk about such a wonderful project as LiQNET The idea of creating LiQNET was born in 2015 by financiers and entrepreneurs Roman Shirokov, Vyacheslav Kasatkin and Evgeny Tarasenko, as a result of a detailed analysis of the problems of the exchange market. The goal of the project is to create a unique and reliable exchange that can combine liquidity with competing platforms and solve the problem of market fragmentation. The main feature of LIQNET is the unique technology of LEN (Liquidity Exchange Network). LEN collects and consolidates orders from exchange customers and third-party platforms into a single book of orders and makes them available for trading to all LIQNET clients. In this regard, traders can conclude deals at the most favorable prices with a minimum spread. In addition, on the server side of the LIQNET platform there is a private cloud consisting of physical servers in several places and client terminals. All of them have passed lengthy and thorough tests in the field of security. Recently in Berlin, an event related to the blocking took place, representatives of LiQNET were present with the idea of obtaining licenses for the stock exchange due to the fact that in the world of crypto currency there was a shift towards the regulation of the crypto-currency market, which is a necessary step to ensure the safety of the user and ease of mind for investors. LiQNET constantly tests new ideas, attracts new consultants, adds coins to new promising projects, learns from market leaders and creates new partnerships.
LiQNET announced a change in tactics to better serve the community, it will implement several necessary updates to raise the project to a new level. To do this, LiQNET temporarily suspended the operation of the ICO and again started the carousel in order to provide the necessary time for making changes to the project. Finally, the work on the project continues in accordance with the announced plans: the connection of a third-party trading terminal, as well as mobile applications, setting up payment gateways for the Fiat team during the ICO. The LiQNET platform continues to work in test mode on liqnet.com. The idea of the project
The LIQNET credit exchange will operate on the basis of the LEN (Liquidity Exchange Network) mechanism, this technology increases liquidity and allows combining orders of users, even third-party platforms work in the common order pool, all this makes trading more accessible to LIQNET customers. At the moment there are many crypto-exchange exchanges but they are all far from perfect.
LIQNET combines liquidity flows from different platforms in one book with a limited order. This is achieved by using the patented LEN (Liquidity Exchange Network) mechanism. It collects and integrates through API purchases or sales orders from various exchanges around the world. This forms a single book with limited exchange. LEN combines this into a single stream so that you can conduct raids at the best prices with minimal dispersion. Using LEN, you can create an improved model of the depth of the market. Unlike the standard model, it provides additional liquidity at a time when the supply meets demand. This solution is excellent, but we need another crypto, even with the new technology. There are so many of them. If you filter out all exchanges based on reliability and availability for traders, you will only have very few that you can work with. LIQNET is available and reliable, the platform is carefully checked and reliably protected. LIQNET safely and effectively unites people and financial flows. The main advantages for investors ICO In the growing crypto currency market, ICO LIQNET can be one of the few options for investors to enter the crypto currency services and exchange the market through a ready-made project. The sale price of the token is only 1 Lenovo token = 1 dollar, and with the investors' demand it is expected that the price of the token will increase. Then, as an investor, you can benefit from this. LIQNET ICO, definitely will stand out among most others because of the tactics of a well-thought-out thought that will be deployed in the coming months. It's not just an idea. This is a real product ready to be launched. It will be able to increase its competitive advantages and allow LIQNET to develop exponentially with the help of tokenization. ROADMAP AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE
Information about the creators of the project LiQNET was created by a team of professionals in the field of finance, law and technology with proven experience in traditional investments and trading in the Forex market. The key members of the team are Roman Shirokov (CEO), Evgeny Tarasenko (CTO) and Vyacheslav Kasatkin. LiQNET was registered in 2015. The company is registered at the address in Singapore (10 Maxwell Road, Singapore).
submitted by jottu5 to u/jottu5 [link] [comments]

Binary Assassin Review Is BinaryAssassin.co Scam Or Not? - Binary Assassin Review Is Binary Assassin A Scam Or Legit?

Binary Assassin Review Is Binary Assassin Software A Scam Or Legit? Does Binary Assassin System Works? My Binary Assassin Review Share With The Honest Truth About Binary Assassin System Until Download & Invest in It
Binary Assassin is the Most Advanced & Safest Bot That Can Make You Financially FREE! You do not have to do anything! You don’t need ANY previous experience to fire this up and start seeing your first AUTOPILOT profits in MINUTES. All of the money in your account is 100% yours. No commissions. No games. Your life-changing moment have finally come and is knocking at your front door.
Product Name: Binary Assassin
Binary Assassin Website: BinaryAssassin.co!
Binary Assassin CEO: Binary Assassin Team
Binary Assassin Cost: FREE
Binary Assassin is generally a binary options trading software application that is developed to help traders win and forecast the marketplace trends with binary options. The software also provides evaluations of the market conditions so that traders can know what should be your next step. It provides different secret methods that ultimately helps. traders without utilizing any complicated trading indications or follow graphs.
Why are there hundreds of thousands of traders and investors via the Internet who trade in the Binary Options Trading market a day and see how to earn money in this area?
This report is divided into two parts will be separated clearly and simply essential points that will help you avoid the usual pitfalls to start earning money through Binary Options Trading.
Pairs trading, not currencies – Like any other relationship, you should be aware of both sides. Success or failure in Binary Options trading depends on correct your estimates on both currencies components of the husband and how both affect on one another, not just one of them.
Knowledge is power – when it begins Binary Options Trading on the Internet, it is essential that you understand the basics of this market if you want to achieve the maximum benefit from your investment.
The main index in the Binary Options market is global events and news. For example, if we assume that the European Central Bank will issue a statement regarding the interest rates, the euro usually this event will cause a wave of activity in the market. Most of the new arrivals seem a backlash to such news as they close their trading positions to miss one of the best trading opportunities with a preference to wait until the market once again restless. The possibility of real profit in the Binary Options appear in times of volatility, not in the quiet times.
Trade is ambitious – many new traders are putting too restrictive orders in order to reap a very small profit. This approach is not desirable in options trading because despite being profitable in the short term (that is if you are lucky asset), you run the risk to be a loser in the long run because it will have to cover the difference between the prices of the question-and-take before they start making any profits, a which it is more difficult when you are a small trading at him when the biggest trades.
Trade cautiously exaggerated – just like rolling which is trying to reap a small profit all the time, the trader who puts a stop loss close with a broker retail orders is the other loses. As mentioned above, it must be given to the center of your trade fair opportunity to prove his ability on production. If the points did not put a reasonable stop loss so as to allow for your business that is showing its capacity to act, in most cases you will end this trade has reduced the ability after the loss of a small part of the submissions you with all trading center.
Independence – If you are new to Binary Options trading! , you will decide either trading or using the money be used for trade rackets for you. So far, it looks good. But your loss risk will increase exponentially with any of these two things:
Interference with Binary Assassin! do on your behalf (because the strategy may require a long period of pregnancy);
Find advice from too many sources – multiple input leads inevitably lead to multiple losses. Open trading center and then kept it until the end and then Analyze outputs or results, yourself, and yourself.
Small margins – Margin trading is one of the best features in Binary Options Trading as it allows you to trade amounts far greater than the total volume of Binary Assassin System. Nevertheless, it may also be dangerous for novice traders because of the greed factor that destroys a lot of Binary Assassin traders. The best advice here is to increase your leverage in parallel with the high level of experience and the degree of your success.
Lack of strategy – the goal of making money is not a trading strategy. Binary Assassin strategy that will help you in the planning process to make money. Your strategy in detail the approach that will adopted by the sense that the currency will be handled and how to manage your risk. Without a strategy, often will be within the 90% of new traders lose their money.
Trading outside peak hours – traders professional Binary Assassin traders options and funds of hedge has a great advantage excel by retailers young during the hours of off-peak (between 22:00 and 10:00 EST) because they can do the hedge to the Centers for their trading and move them here or there with a small trading volumes (in the sense that their risks are smaller). Homosexual advice for trading outside the peak hours is simply – are not traded. Click Here To Download Binary Assassin Software Right NOW!
Binary Options Trading are all shortcuts for common foreign exchange market exchange. In fact, it is the largest financial market in the world where they are buying and selling currencies freely. On the current situation, the Binary Options Trading market was launched in the seventies of the last century and that while the liberalization of exchange rates so that the participants in this market are now only determine the price of any currency against other currencies based on supply and demand levels. When it comes to freedom and to stay away from any external control is to achieve free competition, the Binary Options Trading is is the perfect place to achieve all these things. This is because the daily trading volume in the Binary Options of several trillion dollars, which means that the currency market in more than three times the size of the total size of the US stock market and bond together. Binary Options market is the exchange of cross-communication networks where buyers and sellers meet to conduct treatment using technological means communication market.
Unlike other financial markets, the Binary Options Trading has no central exchange or a physical entity. Since this market is not expressed as a physical place, the exchange trades take place on an ongoing basis on the four and twenty hours a day saluting moving from time zone to another by navigating across the major financial centers in the world and that on a daily basis. Trillions of dollars of foreign currency exchange activities occur on a daily basis in Options trading. Since 1997 and until the end of 2000, the Binary Options daily trading volumes almost increased from five billion to $1.5 trillion, and perhaps more (according to some recent studies, the trading volumes touched the level of $1.7 trillion in today is superior to all other financial markets combined). I think it’s really difficult, if not impossible .- to determine an exact figure because the absolute Binary Options trading is not through a central exchange, but certain thing is that the Binary Assassin Software continues to grow at rates amazing.
Before the advent of the Internet and e-commerce, the big multinational companies, banks and high net worth individuals they are entitled to trading in the Binary Options market through the use of bank-owned trading systems. These systems were required as a minimum to open a trading account about one million dollars. Thanks to new technology developments, especially with regard to the internet today, the investors can use a few thousand dollars that go into the Binary Options market on the four and twenty hours a day, five days a week throughout.
Forex market is a nonstop cash market where the currencies of countries trading in connection with and usually through intermediaries who call them mediators Binary Options. Foreign currencies are continuously sold and purchased through local and global markets in more than investors or detract from the value of an investment based on currency movements. Binary Options market conditions may change at any moment in response to current events and this ranks as one of the more volatile Binary Options and the fragility of markets. Also, the conditions of the Binary Options Trading does not remain the same, but never changed in almost every second. Trading volumes in the foreign exchange market than all the combined transactions that occur in the stock markets and futures markets in both London and Tokyo. According to its size and scope, the Binary Options market times other markets sizes. Statistics indicate that the immediate and directed trades that occur in the interbank market is divided as follows. 51% in the form of an Instant Forex transactions, followed by 32% in the form of currency swap operations, Binary Assassin Software transactions explicit also represents 5% of daily turnover, while the “interbank” equal to the other about 8% and therefore, the interbank market accounts allocated of which about 96% transactions Options the foreign exchange market as the exchange of 4% in the other, divided between global futures exchanges.
For Binary Assassin traders, the Binary Options Trading represent an alternative to trading in the stock market. While there are thousands of stocks to choose them, there are a number of key stocks that are traded in the Binary Options market (the US dollar and the Japanese yen and the British pound, Swiss franc and the euro currency is the most famous). Binary Options Trading also allows the trader crane outweigh what is happening in the stock market as well as a minimum level of investment in order to start trade. Add to that the ability to choose the appropriate trading Times ( Binary Options conducted on twenty-four hours) over here and perhaps might be known the reason why many stock traders to abandon their fields and arriving about Forex Trading.
Is Binary Assassin Software A Scam
Binary Assassin Software is not A scam It’s legit and Safe Binary System. Binary Assassin is Automated Binary Options Trading Signals Software . Download Binary Assassin System APP %100 Risk-Free + $1000 Bonus Free NOW…
Click Here To Download Binary Assassin Software Right NOW!
. . . . . . . . . . .
Tags: Binary Assassin app, Binary Assassin information, Binary Assassin url, Binary Assassin website, Binary Assassin youtube video, Binary Assassin trading software, get Binary Assassin, article about Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin computer program, Binary Assassin the truth, Binary Assassin support, Binary Assassin support email address, Binary Assassin help desk, similar than Binary Assassin, better than Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin contact, Binary Assassin demo, Binary Assassin video tutorial, how does Binary Assassin work, is Binary Assassin the best online is Binary Assassin a scam, does Binary Assassin really work, does Binary Assassin actually work, Binary Assassin members area, Binary Assassin login page, Binary Assassin verification, Binary Assassin software reviews, Binary Assassin no fake review, Binary Assassin Live Broadcast, is Binary Assassin real, Binary Assassin forex trading, Binary Assassin binary options trading, Binary Assassin automated app, the Binary Assassin review, Binary Assassin signals, Binary Assassin mac os x, Binary Assassin broker sign up, Binary Assassin free download, reviews of Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin live results, Binary Assassin bonus, Binary Assassin honest review, Binary Assassin 2015, is Binary Assassin worth the risk, Binary Assassin pc desktop, Binary Assassin free trial,Binary Assassin testimonial, Binary Assassin scam watch dog, Binary Assassin warrior forum, Binary Assassin web version, Binary Assassin open a account, Binary Assassin laptop, Binary Assassin revised Method 2015, Binary Assassin Unbiased review, is Binary Assassin all hype?, real people invested in Binary Assassin, is Binary Assassin a shame, Binary Assassin discount, Binary Assassin binary option watch dog review, Binary Assassin youtube, seriously will Binary Assassin work, Binary Assassin facebook, Binary Assassin activation code, Binary Assassin 2015 Working, Binary Assassin twitter, Binary Assassin currency trading, Binary Assassin real person review, Binary Assassin example trade, will Binary Assassin work on mobile phone, Completely New Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin customer service, new Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin webinar, Binary Assassin webinar replay, Binary Assassin anybody using this, Binary Assassin real or fake, is Binary Assassin live trades real, Binary Assassin is this a scam, is Binary Assassin reliable?, Binary Assassin honest reviews, Binary Assassin is it a scam, Binary Assassin download software, Binary Assassin app review, Binary Assassin software download, Binary Assassin forum, Binary Assassin signals, Binary Assassin download page, Binary Assassin software demo somebody using it, Binary Assassin binary software, Binary Assassin binary options review, Binary Assassin members, Binary Assassin scam or legit,Binary Assassin comments, minimum deposit for Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin reviews, Binary Assassin binary today, Binary Assassin pro review, Binary Assassin windows 7, Binary Assassin windows 8 and windows XP, Binary Assassin scam or real, Binary Assassin login, Binary Assassin has anybody out there made any money out of it?, Binary Assassin vip membership pass, does Binary Assassin work on autopilot?, Binary Assassin price, is Binary Assassin a scam or not, will Binary Assassin help me, real truth about Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin System, Binary Assassin inside members page, Binary Assassin software downloads, how to download Binary Assassin, how to access Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin Robot, how to use Binary Assassin, how to trade with Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin NEWS Update and details, Binary Assassin sign in, the Binary Assassin trading options, Binary Assassin info, Binary Assassin information, Binary Assassin searching for new winning trades, Binary Assassin today, Binary Assassin feedback, Binary Assassin real user review, Binary Assassin customer reviews, Binary Assassin consumer review, Binary Assassin Review 2015, insider john Binary Assassin review, george s Binary Assassin review, Binary Assassin doesn't work, is Binary Assassin another scam or legit, Binary Assassin refund, Activate Binary Assassin, review of Binary Assassin, log on to Binary Assassin, is Binary Assassin manual binary trading, Binary Assassin bot review, Binary Assassin test, Binary Assassin explanation, what brokers work with Binary Assassin software, what is Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin news, new version of Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin fan Page, Binary Assassin breaking news, Binary Assassin Register, Binary Assassin sign up, Binary Assassin broker sign up, Binary Assassin real proof, how to activate auto trading on Binary Assassin,Binary Assassin robot, Binary Assassin members area, Binary Assassin sign in, web version Binary Assassin, should i use Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin yes or no, do i need trading experience, Binary Assassin create account, Binary Assassin instructions, how to get a Binary Assassin demo, Binary Assassin special, desktop Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin Secret method, Join Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin ea trading app, Binary Assassin limited time, Binary Assassin pros and cons, Binary Assassin bad reviews, is Binary Assassin software automatic binary trading, Binary Assassin negative and positive review, Binary Assassin Author, Binary Assassin creator, who made Binary Assassin, what is the Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin real review, Binary Assassin broker, Binary Assassin sign up broker, Binary Assassin sign up broker review, Binary Assassin fund broker, Binary Assassin how to fund broker,Binary Assassin deposit funds into broker, how does Binary Assassin trade, Binary Assassin trading bot, what is Binary Assassin and cost?, Binary Assassin strategy, Binary Assassin password reset, Binary Assassin beta tester, binaryassassin.co Review, binaryassassin.co Reviews, Binary Assassin comparison, Binary Assassin questions and answers, rate & review Binary Assassin, rate and reviews Binary Assassin, is Binary Assassin site legit?, Binary Assassin reviews online, is Binary Assassin for real, Binary Assassin By James Ruskin Review,Binary Assassin James Ruskin Review, Binary Assassin login page, Binary Assassin results, Binary Assassin winning and losing trades, Binary Assassin overview, Binary Assassin training, how to setup Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin home, real testimonial on Binary Assassin system, Binary Assassin real time trading, start trading with Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin proof, Binary Assassin the truth, Get Binary Assassin, Binary Assassin Review
submitted by spicygeeks to BinaryAssassinReview [link] [comments]

liqnet

The cryptocurrency market is experiencing stress. It needs a tool of unification; a new stage of blurring the boundaries between asset owners. The LEN mechanism (liqnet), together with increased security and uniform tools for trading on multiple exchanges at once, makes LIQNET one of the factors driving the growth of the entire industry
ABOUT THE COMPANY
LIQNET was incorporated in 2015 by financiers and entrepreneurs Roman Shirokov, Vyacheslav Kasatkin and Yevgeny Tarasenko as a result of a detailed analysis of the problems of the exchange market. The project’s aim is to set up a unique and reliable exchange, which can pool liquidity from competing platforms and solve the problem of market fragmentation.The main feature of LIQNET is the unique LEN (Liquidity Exchange Network) technology. LEN collects and consolidates orders from exchange customers and third-party platforms into a single order book and makes them available for trading to all LIQNET’s clients. Due to this, traders can make deals at the most favorable prices with a minimum spread.
Also, on the server side of the LIQNET platform is a private cloud, which consists of physical servers in several locations and client terminals. All of them have undergone lengthy and thorough testing in the field of security. RAISING THE PROJECT TO A NEW LEVEL
A blockchain event in Berlin took place recently, representatives of LIQNET were present with the idea of obtaining licenses for the exchange due to the fact of the shift in the crytocurrency world moving towards regulating the crypto-currency market, a necessary step for user safety and ease of mind for investors. LIQNET is constantly testing new ideas, attracting new advisors, adding coins to new promising projects, learning from market leaders, and forging new partnerships.
LIQNET have announced a change in tactics to better serve the community, it will implement several necessary updates to raise the project to a new level. To do this, LIQNET have temporarily suspended the ICO and are starting the carousel again to enable necessary time to make changes to the project.
Lastly, the work on the project continues according to the announced plans: the connection of a third-party trading terminal, as well as mobile applications, the setting up of payment gateways by the team to receive Fiat during the ICO. The LIQNET platform continues to run in test mode on liqnet.com.
LIQNET TOKEN DESCRIPTION:
Token ticker symbol: LEN
Standard: ERC20
One LEN token price: $1
Payment methods: ETH, BTC, BCH, ZEC, LTC, XRP, Waves
BENEFITS FOR THE TOKEN HOLDERS.
On the growing cryptocurrency market, LIQNET’s ICO may be one of the few options for investors to enter the cryptocurrency services and exchanges market through a finished elaborated project.
The selling price of the token is only 1 Len token =1 dollars and with the demand of investors it is expected that the price of the token will increase. Then, as an investor, you can certainly benefit from it.
LIQNET ICO, definately will stand out from the majority of the others because of the well thought tactics that will be deployed in the coming months. It is not just an idea. It is a real product ready for launch. It will be able to increase its competitive advantages and allow LIQNET to develop exponentially with WHO IS BEHIND a LIQNET
LIQNET was created by a team of finance, law, and technology professionals with a proven track record in traditional investments and forex trading.
Key members of the team include Roman Shirokov (CEO), Evgeny Tarasenko (CTO), and Vyacheslav Kasatkin.
LIQNET was incorporated in 2015. The company is registered to an address in Singapore (10 Maxwell Road, Singapore).
submitted by Sl1mXgod to u/Sl1mXgod [link] [comments]

Algo Scalper V2 Review 2015 - Is AlgoScalper SCAM? How Does Algo Scalper V2 Software Work??? WINNER OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL ALGORITHMIC TRADING COMPETITION

Algo Scalper V2 Review 2015 - Insider Look Into The NewAlgo Scalper V2! So What is Algo Scalper V2 Software all about? So Does Algo Scalper V2 Actually Work? Is Algo Scalper V2 Software scam or does it really work?
To find answers to these concerns continue reading my in depth and honest Algo Scalper V2 Review below.
Algo Scalper V2 Description:
Name: Algo Scalper
Niche: Binary Options.
Official Site: Activate The NEW Algo Scalper V2!! CLICK HERE NOW!!!
What is Algo Scalper?
Algo Scalper V2 is essentially a binary options trading software that is designed to help traders win and predict the marketplace trends with binary options. The software application also provides evaluations of the market conditions so that traders can know what should be your next step. It gives various secret strategies that eventually helps. traders without using any complex trading indicators or follow charts.
Algo Scalper V2 Binary Options Trading Method
Base the AlgoScalper V2 trading method. After you see it working, you can begin to implement your strategy with routine sized lots. This technique will pay off with time. Every Forex binary options trader must choose an account type that is in accordance with their needs and expectations. A larger account does not mean a bigger profit potential so it is a terrific concept to start little and slowly add to your account as your returns increase based on the trading selections you make.
Binary Options Trading
To assist you trade binary options effectively, it is necessary to have an understanding behind the principles of Binary Options Trading. Currency Trading, or forex, is based on the perceived value of. 2 currencies relative to one another, and is influenced by the political stability of the country, inflation and interest rates to name a few things. Keep this in mind as you trade and learn more about binary options to optimize your learning experience.
Algo Scalper V2 Summary
In summary, there are some evident concepts that have been tested over time, as well as some more recent methods. that you may not have actually thought about. Hopefully, as long as you follow what we recommend in this short article you can either start with trading with Algo Scalper V2 or improve on exactly what you have actually currently done.
Algo Scalper V2 Is The WINNER OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL ALGORITHMIC TRADING COMPETITION!! Click Here To Claim Your Algo Scalper V2 LIFETIME User License!!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Are You Looking For A Algo Scalper V2 Alternative?? CLICK HERE NOW!
Tags: Algo Scalper V2 app, Algo Scalper V2 information, Algo Scalper V2 url, Algo Scalper V2 website, Algo Scalper V2 trading software, get Algo Scalper V2, article about Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 computer program Algo Scalper V2 support, Algo Scalper V2 support email address, Algo Scalper V2 help desk, similar than Algo Scalper V2, better than Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 contact, Algo Scalper V2 demo, Algo Scalper V2 video tutorial, how does Algo Scalper V2 work, is Algo Scalper V2 the best online, Algo Scalper review By Harry Pearce, Algo Scalper By Harry Pearce, is Algo Scalper V2 a scam, does Algo Scalper V2 really work, does Algo Scalper V2 actually work, Algo Scalper V2 members area, algoscalper.com review, algoscalper.com reviews, Algo Scalper V2 login page, Algo Scalper V2 verification, Algo Scalper V2 software reviews, Algo Scalper V2 no fake review, Algo Scalper V2 Live Broadcast, is Algo Scalper V2 real, Algo Scalper V2 forex trading, Algo Scalper V2 binary options trading, Algo Scalper V2 automated app, the Algo Scalper V2 review, Algo Scalper V2 signals, Algo Scalper V2 mac os x, Algo Scalper V2 broker sign up, Algo Scalper V2 free download, reviews of Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper Review, AlgoScalper Review Algo Scalper V2 bonus, Algo Scalper V2 honest review, Algo Scalper V2 2015, is Algo Scalper V2 worth the risk, Algo Scalper V2 pc desktop, Algo Scalper V2 free trial, Algo Scalper V2 testimonial, Algo Scalper V2 warrior forum, Algo Scalper V2 web version, Algo Scalper V2 open a account, Algo Scalper V2 laptop, Algo Scalper V2 revised Method 2015, Algo Scalper V2 discount, Algo Scalper V2 youtube, seriously will Algo Scalper V2 work, Algo Scalper V2 facebook, Algo Scalper V2 activation code, Algo Scalper V2 2015 Working, Algo Scalper V2 twitter, Algo Scalper V2 currency trading, Algo Scalper V2 example trade, will Algo Scalper V2 work on mobile phone, Completely New Algo Scalper V2, new Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 webinar, will Algo Scalper V2 help me, real truth about Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 System, Algo Scalper V2 inside members page, how to download Algo Scalper V2, how to access Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 Robot, how to use Algo Scalper V2, how to trade with Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 NEWS Update and details, Algo Scalper V2 today, Algo Scalper V2 feedback, Algo Scalper V2 real user review, Algo Scalper V2 customer reviews, Algo Scalper V2 consumer review, Algo Scalper V2 Review 2015 Algo Scalper V2 doesn't work, is Algo Scalper V2 another scam or legit, Algo Scalper V2 refund, Activate Algo Scalper V2, review of Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 test, Algo Scalper V2 explanation, what is Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 news, new version of Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 fan Page, Algo Scalper V2 breaking news, should i use Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 yes or no, do i need trading experience, Algo Scalper V2 create account, Algo Scalper V2 instructions, smartmoneyapp.co review, smartmoneyapp.co reviews, Algo Scalper V2 Secret method, Join Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 ea trading app, Algo Scalper V2 limited time, Algo Scalper V2 pros and cons, Algo Scalper V2 bad reviews, Algo Scalper V2 negative and positive review, Algo Scalper V2 Author, Algo Scalper V2 creator, who made Algo Scalper V2, what is the Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 real review, Algo Scalper V2 strategy, Algo Scalper V2 password reset, Algo Scalper V2 beta tester, Algo Scalper V2 comparison, Algo Scalper V2 questions and answers, Algo Scalper V2 results, Algo Scalper V2 winning and losing trades, Algo Scalper V2 overview, Algo Scalper V2 training, how to setup Algo Scalper V2, start trading with Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 proof, Algo Scalper V2 the truth, Get Algo Scalper V2, Algo Scalper V2 Review
Click Here To Download Algo Scalper V2 Right NOW!
submitted by MarshallPoppe to MarshallPoppe [link] [comments]

17 Year Old Forex Trader Turns £2,800 into £150,000 in ... Beware: Learn to Trade the Market's Trading is Like Gambling Forex breakout strategy trading results GBP/USD 02/02/2015 ... Forex Trading Competition, $1.4 m in One Month! - YouTube Live Forex Trading: Different Ways To Attack A Trade Simple Day Trading System For Forex Traders - Trade Results For September 2015 Forex Video: Forex Trading Strategy Session

Forex trading competitions are the best way for you to gain experience in Forex trading and to try out and improve your trading strategies. ForexCup offers: Demo ECN trading. During the contest you will be trading in the Demo ECN environment of FXOpen broker. All trading is done via the well-known and popular MetaTrader 4 terminal. We are the one and only forex school that produces real trading results that can be verified over at: ... forex trading competition. Sunday, 31 May 2015. Let’s welcome our participant no. 14 Mr Md N A Khan and no. 11 Mr Dca Tan . Let’s welcome our participant no. 14 Mr Md N A Khan, who has been trading forex for quite a few years. He uses a combination of technical and fundamental analysis ... Trading futures and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. 2020 World Cup Championship of Futures Trading® RANK NAME NET RETURN LOCATION; 1: Stefan Seibert : 355.7%: Germany: 2: Michael O’Keeffe: 293.6%: Australia: 3: Yuwen Cao: 244.6%: Hong Kong: 4: Evgeny Kartashov: 165.8%: Russia: 5 ... Forex Trading Results for 2019 - trading price action on the 1 hour, 4 hour and daily time-frames Verified Results - myfxbook . Total Return 2019: 322.48%. Max closed draw-down 2.12%! No losing months! ..... 2020 Forex Trading Results for 2020 - trading price action on 1 hour, 4 hour and daily time-frames Verified Results - myfxbook Total Return 2020: TBC. Max closed draw-down: TBC If you have ... Compete against the best forex traders in the world and win real money with no risk Sign In. Home . News; Economic Calendar ... Only partake in the trading contests when you feel you ready to trade. All Quotes AUDUSD 0.72753: USDCHF 0.91247: EURJPY 124.128: EURCHF 1.07877: EURGBP 0.89699: GBPJPY 138.369: EURUSD 1.18216: GBPUSD 1.31788: USDJPY 104.995: USDCAD 1.30071: EURUSD: 1.18216: GBPUSD: 1 ... According to the Bank for International Settlements, the preliminary global results from the 2013 Triennial Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and OTC Derivatives Markets Activity show that trading in foreign exchange markets averaged $5.3 trillion per day in April 2013. This is up from $4.0 trillion in April 2010 and $3.3 trillion in April 2007. Friendly Trading Competition 2015 Participant 1 : Max Poon Instrument : Forex Capital : 1st Account: USD 8,950 (as of 23rd Dec 2014) 2nd Account: SGD 20,000 ...

[index] [21729] [27793] [5371] [26252] [10372] [24537] [21353] [2098] [8807] [7637]

17 Year Old Forex Trader Turns £2,800 into £150,000 in ...

If playback doesn't begin shortly, try restarting your device. You're signed out. Videos you watch may be added to the TV's watch history and influence TV recommendations. To avoid this, cancel ... How to enter reversal patterns with less risk... and many other technical analysis points in this forex market review. May the pips be with you! - Wayne McDonell Chief FX Market Strategist ... Forex breakout strategy trading results GBP/USD 02/02/2015 - 06/02/2015 330 Pip Profit. Learn to trade this strategy at www.forextradingschools.com. Forex Bank Trading Course: http://www.daytradingforexlive.com/day-trading-forex-education-course/ September brought one of the toughest months of trading for... Watch this video to see why Learn to Trade the Market trades nothing like they say they do. Their trades from the Million Dollar Trading Competition (and the results) are horrible - these are what ... Forex trading competition, contestant made $1.4 million in one month! My result was only about $13000, You can see all results here - https://www.tallinex.co... Published on Feb 3, 2015. A recorded session from my Live Trading Room this morning looking at a potential trading opportunity on the USDCAD. On this particular trade we have an advanced pattern ...

https://arab-binary-option.eadacwinse.ga